Bug 1367585
Summary: | glibc: Port away from Lua for %posttrans | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Colin Walters <walters> |
Component: | glibc | Assignee: | glibc team <glibc-bugzilla> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 31 | CC: | arjun.is, codonell, dj, dustymabe, fweimer, jakub, law, mfabian, pfrankli, siddhesh |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-10-30 14:22:34 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1352154 |
Description
Colin Walters
2016-08-16 20:56:41 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 26 development cycle. Changing version to '26'. Can someone review this please? (In reply to Colin Walters from comment #2) > Can someone review this please? Sure, we can review and test this. When do you need this fixed by? It's not an immediate need, but it blocks https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/729 and also `rpm-ostree ex container`, which can be dramatically faster than traditional dnf/yum rootfs assembly - the primary target is using it for buildroots. (In reply to Carlos O'Donell from comment #3) > (In reply to Colin Walters from comment #2) > > Can someone review this please? > > Sure, we can review and test this. When do you need this fixed by? Any ETA? (In reply to Dusty Mabe from comment #5) > (In reply to Carlos O'Donell from comment #3) > > (In reply to Colin Walters from comment #2) > > > Can someone review this please? > > > > Sure, we can review and test this. When do you need this fixed by? > > Any ETA? Probably some time in the next rawhide cycle we'll cleanup a few of these outstanding patches. Do you have a workaround for this? Is it blocking your progress? This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 27 development cycle. Changing version to '27'. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 28 development cycle. Changing version to '28'. This message is a reminder that Fedora 28 is nearing its end of life. On 2019-May-28 Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 28. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '28'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 28 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. Fedora 28 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2019-05-28. Fedora 28 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 31 development cycle. Changing version to '31'. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 31 development cycle. Changing version to 31. We need one Lua %posttrans for backwards compatibility with older glibc packages. This is not an issue for your use-case, though? I think it will work just to ignore the script. > We need one Lua %posttrans for backwards compatibility with older glibc packages. This is not an issue for your use-case, though? I think it will work just to ignore the script.
Sounds fine, yeah - rpm-ostree always constructs a *new* rootfs today, there's no live mutation of an existing root.
Do you have a link to the (proposed?) code change though?
The change went into Fedora 31, as bug 1715891. |