Bug 1367790

Summary:	SRIOV- To assign neutron port to PF we need to set in whitelist the PCI ID
Product:	Red Hat OpenStack	Reporter:	Eran Kuris <ekuris>
Component:	documentation	Assignee:	RHOS Documentation Team <rhos-docs>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Eran Kuris <ekuris>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	10.0 (Newton)	CC:	amuller, beagles, ekuris, nyechiel, oblaut, srevivo
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Documentation
Target Release:	10.0 (Newton)
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-11-02 08:54:48 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1325686

Description Eran Kuris 2016-08-17 13:18:24 UTC

Description of problem:
If we want to assign neutron port to PF (rfe- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325686)
we should set in controller under : /etc/neutron/plugins/ml2/ml2_conf_sriov.ini
The PF ID under this parameter : 
supported_pci_vendor_devs = 8086:154d
* it is possible to set both IDs   PF & VFs 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHOs 10 

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 Eran Kuris 2016-08-24 11:35:51 UTC

you can use this guide : 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qQbJlLI1hSlE4uwKpmVd0BoGSDBd8Z0lTzx5itQ6WL0/edit#

Comment 3 Assaf Muller 2016-08-29 20:13:59 UTC

TripleO will support SRIOV in OSP 10, in which case this parameter will be an input to a Heat template that is self documented. I'm not sure if we actually need separate documentation?

Here is the patch in the TripleO SRIOV effort: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/327735/3/puppet/services/neutron-plugin-ml2.yaml, it seems to default to Intel & Mellanox, Eran do you think we can close the bug?

Comment 4 Eran Kuris 2016-08-30 07:19:59 UTC

let's wait until we get TripleO  and I will check that this parameter is not missing. After that I will close it .

Comment 5 Ofer Blaut 2016-08-30 07:37:56 UTC

We must check tripleo support and close the bug if it works

Comment 6 Nir Yechiel 2016-09-13 13:44:30 UTC

Now that TripleO support is merged, can you confirm if this bug is still needed?

Thanks,
Nir

Comment 7 Eran Kuris 2016-09-15 07:21:24 UTC

I will test it and let you know. we dont have stable puddle of tripleO so when we get one  I will check it and update the bug

Comment 8 Eran Kuris 2016-11-02 08:54:48 UTC

After I checked it on OSPD10 & OSP10  puddle 2016-10-06.1  
I success to deploy SRIOV (with PF& VF support).
The process was to set the parameters in yaml file and deploy overcloud with SRIOV.