Bug 1368848 (rubygem-mercenary)
Summary: | Review Request: rubygem-mercenary - An easier way to build your command-line scripts in Ruby | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Björn 'besser82' Esser <besser82> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | gil cattaneo <puntogil> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | package-review, puntogil |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | puntogil:
fedora-review+
|
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-08-28 17:15:19 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1368851 |
Description
Björn 'besser82' Esser
2016-08-21 20:47:11 UTC
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package contains Requires: ruby(release). ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 23 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1368848 -rubygem-mercenary/licensecheck.txt Source files without license headers: mercenary-0.3.6/examples/help_dialogue.rb mercenary-0.3.6/examples/logging.rb mercenary-0.3.6/examples/trace.rb mercenary-0.3.6/lib/mercenary.rb mercenary-0.3.6/lib/mercenary/command.rb mercenary-0.3.6/lib/mercenary/option.rb mercenary-0.3.6/lib/mercenary/presenter.rb mercenary-0.3.6/lib/mercenary/program.rb mercenary-0.3.6/lib/mercenary/version.rb mercenary-0.3.6/script/bootstrap mercenary-0.3.6/script/cibuild mercenary-0.3.6/script/console mercenary-0.3.6/script/examples mercenary-0.3.6/spec/command_spec.rb mercenary-0.3.6/spec/option_spec.rb mercenary-0.3.6/spec/presenter_spec.rb mercenary-0.3.6/spec/program_spec.rb mercenary-0.3.6/spec/spec_helper.rb Please, report to upstream [!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. Please, add also License file in doc sub package [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gems/cache, /usr/share/gems, /usr/share/gems/doc [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Ruby: [?]: Platform dependent files must all go under %{gem_extdir_mri}, platform independent under %{gem_dir}. [x]: Gem package must not define a non-gem subpackage [x]: Macro %{gem_extdir} is deprecated. [x]: Gem package is named rubygem-%{gem_name} [x]: Package contains BuildRequires: rubygems-devel. [x]: Gem package must define %{gem_name} macro. [x]: Pure Ruby package must be built as noarch [x]: Package does not contain Requires: ruby(abi). ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages. Note: Package contains font files [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rubygem- mercenary-doc [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. Ruby: [!]: Gem package should exclude cached Gem. [!]: Test suite of the library should be run. [!]: Specfile should use macros from rubygem-devel package. Note: The specfile doesn't use these macros: %{gem_libdir}, %exclude %{gem_cache} [x]: Gem should use %gem_install macro. [x]: gems should not require rubygems package ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-0.1.fc26.noarch.rpm rubygem-mercenary-doc-0.3.6-0.1.fc26.noarch.rpm rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-0.1.fc26.src.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Requires -------- rubygem-mercenary-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): rubygem-mercenary (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/ruby ruby(rubygems) Provides -------- rubygem-mercenary-doc: rubygem-mercenary-doc rubygem-mercenary: rubygem(mercenary) rubygem-mercenary Source checksums ---------------- https://rubygems.org/downloads/mercenary-0.3.6.gem : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 2a084b18f5692c86a633e185d5311ba6d11fc46c802eb414ae05368178078a82 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 2a084b18f5692c86a633e185d5311ba6d11fc46c802eb414ae05368178078a82 Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1368848 --plugins Ruby -m fedora-rawhide-i386 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-i386 Active plugins: Generic, Ruby, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 Issues: ======= - Package contains Requires: ruby(release). [!]: Gem package should exclude cached Gem. [!]: Test suite of the library should be run. [!]: Specfile should use macros from rubygem-devel package. Note: The specfile doesn't use these macros: %{gem_libdir}, %exclude %{gem_cache} NON blocking issues: [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 23 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1368848 -rubygem-mercenary/licensecheck.txt Source files without license headers: mercenary-0.3.6/examples/help_dialogue.rb mercenary-0.3.6/examples/logging.rb mercenary-0.3.6/examples/trace.rb mercenary-0.3.6/lib/mercenary.rb mercenary-0.3.6/lib/mercenary/command.rb mercenary-0.3.6/lib/mercenary/option.rb mercenary-0.3.6/lib/mercenary/presenter.rb mercenary-0.3.6/lib/mercenary/program.rb mercenary-0.3.6/lib/mercenary/version.rb mercenary-0.3.6/script/bootstrap mercenary-0.3.6/script/cibuild mercenary-0.3.6/script/console mercenary-0.3.6/script/examples mercenary-0.3.6/spec/command_spec.rb mercenary-0.3.6/spec/option_spec.rb mercenary-0.3.6/spec/presenter_spec.rb mercenary-0.3.6/spec/program_spec.rb mercenary-0.3.6/spec/spec_helper.rb Please, report to upstream [!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. Please, add also License file in doc sub package Please fix before import Approved Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rubygem-mercenary rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc25 rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-37c56ba33e rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.el7 rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-3d40c22c4e rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.el6 rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-caa664f1d5 rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc24 rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-251f7325a0 rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc25, rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.fc25, rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.fc25, rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-2.fc25, rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc25, rubygem-pathutil-0.14.0-1.fc25, rubygem-rouge-1.11.1-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-37c56ba33e rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc25 rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.fc25 rubygem-jekyll-3.2.1-1.fc25 rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.fc25 rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-2.fc25 rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc25 rubygem-pathutil-0.14.0-1.fc25 rubygem-rouge-1.11.1-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-37c56ba33e rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc24, rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.fc24, rubygem-jekyll-3.2.1-1.fc24, rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.fc24, rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-1.fc24, rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc24, rubygem-pathutil-0.14.0-1.fc24, rubygem-rouge-1.11.1-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-251f7325a0 rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.el6, rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.el6, rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.el6, rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-1.el6, rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.el6, rubygem-pathutil-0.14.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-caa664f1d5 rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.el7, rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.el7, rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.el7, rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-1.el7, rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.el7, rubygem-pathutil-0.14.0-1.el7, rubygem-rouge-1.11.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-3d40c22c4e rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc25, rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.fc25, rubygem-jekyll-3.2.1-1.fc25, rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.fc25, rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-2.fc25, rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc25, rubygem-pathutil-0.14.0-1.fc25, rubygem-rouge-1.11.1-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-37c56ba33e rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc25, rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.fc25, rubygem-jekyll-3.2.1-1.fc25, rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.fc25, rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-2.fc25, rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc25, rubygem-pathutil-0.14.0-1.fc25, rubygem-rouge-1.11.1-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc24, rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.fc24, rubygem-jekyll-3.2.1-1.fc24, rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.fc24, rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-1.fc24, rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc24, rubygem-pathutil-0.14.0-1.fc24, rubygem-rouge-1.11.1-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.el7, rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.el7, rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.el7, rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-1.el7, rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.el7, rubygem-pathutil-0.14.0-1.el7, rubygem-rouge-1.11.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.el6, rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.el6, rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.el6, rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-1.el6, rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.el6, rubygem-pathutil-0.14.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |