Bug 1368874

Summary: [DOCS] [3.3] Document the ability to expose an external port other than 80 and 443
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: Vikram Goyal <vigoyal>
Component: DocumentationAssignee: Timothy <tpoitras>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: zhaozhanqi <zzhao>
Severity: medium Docs Contact: Vikram Goyal <vigoyal>
Priority: medium    
Version: 3.3.0CC: aos-bugs, bmeng, jokerman, mmccomas, mnewby, zzhao
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-09-28 00:47:59 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Vikram Goyal 2016-08-22 02:07:44 UTC
Ability to expose an external port (other than 80 and 443) for ingress traffic routing to a definable backend.

Eng card (is marked as complete): https://trello.com/c/9TXvMeS2

Comment 1 Timothy 2016-09-02 03:28:58 UTC
work in progress docs: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/2779

@marun - there is still a lot of missing info here, I think. But I read through the trello card and the test cases and took my best first attempt. Now I need some help, please.

Please review the following, review for technical accuracy, and also look for questions left in code blocks and as NEEDINFO:

http://file.bne.redhat.com/tpoitras/2016/exposeport/openshift-enterprise/expose-port-BZ1368874/admin_guide/tcp_ingress_external_ports.html

Additionally, does this apply to OpenShift Dedicated 3.3? or just OCP?

Comment 2 Timothy 2016-09-19 04:34:29 UTC
https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/2779

Updated based on comments from preliminary technical review

Comment 3 Timothy 2016-09-20 05:08:31 UTC
Got more notes from Maru Newby on this one, incorporated 2nd technical review and sent back, hopefully for an "ack" so can move along to next type of review.

Comment 6 zhaozhanqi 2016-09-23 03:08:10 UTC
QE added some comments in https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/2779, please help confirm, thanks

Comment 8 zhaozhanqi 2016-09-23 08:53:12 UTC
the issue has been fixed, verified this bug