Bug 137004
Summary: | gfs ocfs ocfs2 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 | Reporter: | Colin Coe <colin.coe> |
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Dave Jones <davej> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Brian Brock <bbrock> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4.0 | CC: | pfrields |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-10-27 19:50:11 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Colin Coe
2004-10-25 03:41:05 UTC
I should have also requested the option to use file systems other than ext[23] (i.e. reiserfs) at install time. Internal RFE bug #137053 entered; will be considered for future releases. Please consider for EL4. We should not have to go into single user mode and unmount /usr (for example) to grow the filesystem. It is this lack of functionality that is preventing Linux being installed on critical systems. A filesystem that can be grown on-line *is critical*. RedHat is touting the aquirement of GFS. Why not do something useful with it? Does RedHat really what to make us use NFS instead? GFS is available for purchase as a layered product for RHEL 3: http://www.redhat.com/software/rha/gfs/ Red Hat's policy is to support the ext3 filesystem in the core product, and not reiserfs or OCFS. Note that RHEL 4 will add support for on-line growing of ext3 filesystems in conjunction with Logical Volume Manager 2 -- built into the base RHEL OS. |