Bug 1370062
Summary: | history userinstalled should not show NEVRA | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko> |
Component: | dnf | Assignee: | rpm-software-management |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 26 | CC: | dmach, fedora, ignatenko, jmracek, mluscon, packaging-team-maint, pnemade, rpm-software-management, samuel.rakitnican, vmukhame |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | dnf-2.5.0-2.fc26 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-06-09 19:06:09 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Igor Gnatenko
2016-08-25 08:31:09 UTC
We can move "history userinstalled" with mentioned use cases into repoquery with new options introduced. *** Bug 1379051 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 26 development cycle. Changing version to '26'. I think that problem can be solved using "dnf repoquery --installonly" (dnf-2.5) where you can specified how many latest packages you want to show and also output format can be modified. I create PR that change documentation and recommends to use repoquery (https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/816). This was more about not showing nevra rather than removing kickstart reference from documentation.... dnf-plugins-extras-2.0.1-1.fc26 dnf-plugins-core-2.1.0-1.fc26 libdnf-0.9.0-1.fc26 dnf-2.5.0-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-92e5a01da8 dnf-2.5.0-1.fc26, dnf-plugins-core-2.1.0-1.fc26, dnf-plugins-extras-2.0.1-1.fc26, libdnf-0.9.0-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-92e5a01da8 dnf-2.5.0-1.fc26 dnf-plugins-core-2.1.0-1.fc26 dnf-plugins-extras-2.0.1-1.fc26 dnfdaemon-0.3.17-3.fc26 libdnf-0.9.0-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-92e5a01da8 dnf-2.5.0-2.fc26 dnf-plugins-core-2.1.0-1.fc26 dnf-plugins-extras-2.0.1-1.fc26 dnfdaemon-0.3.18-1.fc26 libdnf-0.9.0-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-92e5a01da8 dnf-2.5.0-2.fc26, dnf-plugins-core-2.1.0-1.fc26, dnf-plugins-extras-2.0.1-1.fc26, dnfdaemon-0.3.18-2.fc26, libdnf-0.9.0-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-92e5a01da8 The NEVRAs displayed in the output are not those I installed, which may confuse users (installed a NEVRA and updated to something else later). My proposal is to print just names. The latest decision is to keep the patch as it is. Moving back on ON_QA. dnf-2.5.0-2.fc26, dnf-plugins-core-2.1.0-1.fc26, dnf-plugins-extras-2.0.1-1.fc26, dnfdaemon-0.3.18-2.fc26, libdnf-0.9.0-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |