Bug 1370220
Summary: | atomic-openshift-clients rpm fails to re-install | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Stefanie Forrester <dakini> |
Component: | Installer | Assignee: | Scott Dodson <sdodson> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Johnny Liu <jialiu> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 3.3.0 | CC: | agrimm, aos-bugs, dakini, jokerman, mmccomas |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-08-26 16:55:27 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1303130 |
Description
Stefanie Forrester
2016-08-25 14:42:25 UTC
I tried using the suggestion you gave me this morning, stopping docker in case it was mounting /usr/bin/oc as a volume. And it worked! My master is back online. [root@dev-preview-int-master-490df ~]# systemctl stop docker [root@dev-preview-int-master-490df ~]# yum remove atomic-openshift* # it was using oadm in the same way, so I had to remove that too [root@dev-preview-int-master-490df ~]# rm -rf /usr/bin/oadm /usr/bin/oc [root@dev-preview-int-master-490df ~]# file /usr/bin/oadm /usr/bin/oc /usr/bin/oadm: cannot open (No such file or directory) /usr/bin/oc: cannot open (No such file or directory) [root@dev-preview-int-master-490df ~]# yum install atomic-openshift So you're right that docker was creating directories where the binaries should be. Ok, I dont think this is something that we should expect RPM to remedy. Unless you want to treat this as a bug to fix ops automation I'd suggest we CLOSED NOTABUG this one. BTW - it was proposed upstream that docker shouldn't do this, or possibly make it optional, but that was rejected. https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/22857 |