| Summary: | accelerometer not working after boot | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Christopher Tubbs <ctubbsii> |
| Component: | iio-sensor-proxy | Assignee: | Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko> |
| Status: | CLOSED UPSTREAM | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 24 | CC: | bnocera, ignatenko |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-11-16 08:35:27 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Christopher Tubbs
2016-08-29 05:00:59 UTC
I think this should be reopened. The workaround described in the issue can be implemented in Fedora (changing "dbus" to "idle" service type), regardless of any pending upstream fixes. needinfo? flag was canceled, without providing any response to my request to reopen the issue for the stated reasons. I'm resetting the flag. (In reply to Christopher Tubbs from comment #2) > needinfo? flag was canceled, without providing any response to my request to > reopen the issue for the stated reasons. I'm resetting the flag. 1. Needinfo on closed bugs do not make any sense 2. Follow upstream for details 3. Workaround has been applied in upstream "Needinfo on closed bugs do not make any sense" - I disagree. Questions can occur at *any* point in the issue's lifecycle. If workaround has been applied upstream, when will that upstream version make it in to Fedora, to fix the issue in Fedora? (another question, so I'm sorry... but I'm setting needinfo? flag again, so that question doesn't get lost.) I appreciate you don't like the needinfo? flag used on closed issues. However, can you please just answer the question instead of constantly removing the flag and ignoring the question? When will/has this workaround made it into Fedora? If you will check linked issues you will find in which versions in upstream bug got fixed. Compare with fedora version and you will see ;) That doesn't always work... because downstream packages can diverge from upstream. That's why I'm asking the POC/package maintainer. It's a simple question that the packager maintainer can easily answer but anybody else cannot, unless they dig deep. Your minimalist responses to reasonable questions are very unfriendly and antagonistic. If you could just answer the question authoritatively, I would very much appreciate the professionalism and courtesy. (In reply to Christopher Tubbs from comment #1) > I think this should be reopened. The workaround described in the issue can > be implemented in Fedora (changing "dbus" to "idle" service type), > regardless of any pending upstream fixes. No, because the race can still happen. It's a kernel bug anyway, so any discussion that doesn't involve looking at kernel traces is a waste of time. I understand it's a kernel bug, but the kernel devel is complicated, and moves slowly in fringe features like tablet support. A workaround which dramatically improves user experience by significantly reducing the probability of the race condition occurring, is NOT a waste of time, and it'd be nice if user experience were taken into account and the workaround at least considered, rather than simply ignored because it doesn't involve kernel traces. |