| Summary: | Backporting: Haproxy has non-working Horizon session persistence | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Chaitanya Shastri <cshastri> |
| Component: | openstack-puppet-modules | Assignee: | Michele Baldessari <michele> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Ido Ovadia <iovadia> |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | urgent | ||
| Version: | 7.0 (Kilo) | CC: | bperkins, bschmaus, dcadzow, fdinitto, iovadia, jguiditt, jschluet, jslagle, lbezdick, mburns, michele, rhos-flags, rscarazz, srevivo, ushkalim |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FeatureBackport, Triaged, ZStream |
| Target Release: | 7.0 (Kilo) | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | openstack-puppet-modules-2015.1.8-53.el7ost | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-07-20 08:21:55 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Chaitanya Shastri
2016-08-29 07:50:15 UTC
Failed QA
=========
reproduced with openstack-puppet-modules-2015.1.8-53.el7ost.noarch
Steps to Reproduce:
===================
1. Install director and build an overcloud environment with
HA-Controllers(haproxy) configuration.
2. Access horizon from your browser with virtual IP.
3. Move to your project and click "Volumes" tab.
4. Click "Create Volume" and create a new volume.
Actual results:
===============
Horizon doesn't display any pop-up messages in real time.
After you reload the page, horizon display the
pop-up message "Info: Creating volume <volume name>".
(In reply to Ido Ovadia from comment #4) > Failed QA > ========= > reproduced with openstack-puppet-modules-2015.1.8-53.el7ost.noarch > > Steps to Reproduce: > =================== > > 1. Install director and build an overcloud environment with > HA-Controllers(haproxy) configuration. > > 2. Access horizon from your browser with virtual IP. > > 3. Move to your project and click "Volumes" tab. > > 4. Click "Create Volume" and create a new volume. > > Actual results: > =============== > > Horizon doesn't display any pop-up messages in real time. > > After you reload the page, horizon display the > pop-up message "Info: Creating volume <volume name>". The original BZ 1285648 has already been verified in OSP8, this was merely a backport of the same change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/258483/2/manifests/loadbalancer.pp If you look at the haproxy.cfg, does it look like what is expected in the related BZ? Specifically: ------------------------------------------------------------ server mc0 172.17.1.165:80 cookie AAA check fall 5 inter 2000 rise 2 server mc1 172.17.1.167:80 cookie BBB check fall 5 inter 2000 rise 2 server mc2 172.17.1.163:80 cookie CCC check fall 5 inter 2000 rise 2 ------------------------------------------------------------ If it is not fixed here, it makes me wonder how it could work in the newer version. Note that upstream puppet-tripleo[1] has no stable/kilo at this point, as it is out of support there, so this is a downstream backport only. [1] https://github.com/openstack/puppet-tripleo/branches Any update since this issue failed QA? Is the problem larger in scope then just OSP7? Accidentally removed needinfo, fixing. Hi Ido, could we get more info on comment 7 and also how it was tested in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285648 ? I ask because that BZ went from ON_QA to ERRATA and there was no VERIFIED and no comment, so I am wondering a bit how things went here. Because as Jason stated this is a straight backport of something that already was verified so am a bit at loss of what is going on here. Can we maybe work together and set up a reproducer? Thanks, Michele (In reply to Michele Baldessari from comment #11) > Hi Ido, > > could we get more info on comment 7 and also how it was tested in > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285648 ? I ask because that BZ > went from ON_QA to ERRATA and there was no VERIFIED and no comment, so I am > wondering a bit how things went here. Because as Jason stated this is a > straight backport of something that already was verified so am a bit at loss > of what is going on here. > > Can we maybe work together and set up a reproducer? > > Thanks, > Michele Sorry, I moved to another project but still got bugs ant needinfoes :) I don't have free machines to setup this right now... hopefully next week,sorry. Anyway, I mentioned the way I reproduced it, as FailedQA on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371023#c4 |