| Summary: | cinder WARNING Messages popping in log files continuously. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | VIKRANT <vaggarwa> |
| Component: | openstack-cinder | Assignee: | Eric Harney <eharney> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Tzach Shefi <tshefi> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 8.0 (Liberty) | CC: | egafford, eharney, pgrist, rcernin, scohen, srevivo, tshefi |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Flags: | tshefi:
automate_bug-
|
| Target Release: | 11.0 (Ocata) | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | openstack-cinder-10.0.0-0.20170220221031.ea70d55.el7ost | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-05-17 19:32:46 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
VIKRANT
2016-08-30 08:59:26 UTC
Could we please also request backport to OSP 7(Kilo)? This looks like it landed in stable Ocata, okay to move it to POST for OSP11? [ novaclient.v1_1 is deprecated ] 2016-08-13 11:15:10.267 1648 WARNING py.warnings [-] /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/novaclient/v1_1/__init__.py:30: UserWarning: Module novaclient.v1_1 is deprecated (taken as a basis for novaclient.v2). The preferable way to get client class or object you can find in novaclient.client module. This warning message should be fixed in Ocata. The others are mostly warnings that were correctly appearing. Further issues along these lines can be handled in other bugs. Eric, verifying wise would below be sufficient? Install OSP11 (openstack-cinder-10.0.1-0.20170308012116.a7521f5.el7ost) enabled debug=true review logs. Unsure which debug level customer used, debug=true should cover all options. No warnings/errors as mentioned on comments: #6 (first one) or #7 or #9 were found on Cinder's logs. If sufficient I'll changed to verified. Thanks (In reply to Tzach Shefi from comment #11) > Eric, verifying wise would below be sufficient? > Yes, this looks good to me. Verified, See #11-12 above. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2017:1245 |