| Summary: | Publish test results on message bus | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Community] rpm-test-trigger | Reporter: | Roman Joost <rjoost> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | beaker-dev-list |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | unreleased | CC: | jhutar, jorris |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1403972 | ||
|
Description
Roman Joost
2016-08-31 02:35:01 UTC
Should this be done by rpm-test-trigger, or by rpmdeplint? Are the statuses set currently? Do we have them described somehow? What about PASS / FAIL / ERROR (infrastructure failure - please fix infrastructure and rerun) / SKIP (test is not applicable for some case, can be considered as PASS) / WAIVED (test failed, but was wived and so it can be considered as PASS with link to WaiverDB). Dear Jan, should be done by rpm-test-trigger so it can be picked up by Errata Tool. There are currently no statuses defined. From my perspective, things like SKIP and WAIVED aren't applicable here, but rather applicable to waiver DB (correct me if I'm wrong Dan). So the three you came up with sound fine: PASS, FAIL, ERROR. Now thinking of it, didn't we already define them in rpm-test-trigger? |