| Summary: | bugmails for rule engine changes show the rule id but not the rule name | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Community] Bugzilla | Reporter: | Dan Callaghan <dcallagh> |
| Component: | Bugzilla General | Assignee: | PnT DevOps Devs <hss-ied-bugs> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | tools-bugs <tools-bugs> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 4.5 | CC: | huiwang, mtahir, qgong |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-09-01 04:35:01 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1333985 *** |
Here is a recent bugmail for a rule engine change (July 2016): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358619 Red Hat Bugzilla Rules Engine <rule-engine> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |Beaker-backlog? Rule Engine Rule| |52 and here is an older one for the same rule (July 2015): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246485 Red Hat Bugzilla Rules Engine <rule-engine> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |Beaker-backlog? Rule Engine Rule| |beaker_request It used to show the rule name, now it just shows the rule ID. The problem is, Owen tells me that the rule engine admin interface only shows rules by name, not their ID, so when I requested a change to rule 52 he wasn't sure which one that was. It seems like the bugmails should show the rule name since that's more helpful. If it's not possible for some reason, then maybe instead the rule admin interface should be expanded to show the IDs.