Bug 1372461
Summary: | The bodhi client does not work unless the server is installed | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Randy Barlow <randy> |
Component: | bodhi | Assignee: | Randy Barlow <randy> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | urgent | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fale, lmacken, pnemade, randy, zbyszek |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | bodhi-2.2.0-1.fc26 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-09-19 17:41:39 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Randy Barlow
2016-09-01 19:00:31 UTC
> I think I will add a bodhi-common package that will own the distribution bits, which should allow bodhi-client to be installed independently of the server.
The package with the python module should be called python2-bodhi, since it's a normal shared python module. That's what the packaging guidelines specify for names, and also there won't be a conflict when python3-bodhi is added later on.
Hello Zbigniew, I had actually been calling it python2-bodhi-common in my spec file while working on this, but I like your suggestion better. Thanks! Fedora naming standard for python packages is: source: python-%{pypi_name} py2 bin: python2-%{pypi_name} py3 bin: python3-%{pypi_name} I tried to fix this in the spec file, but I came to realize that bodhi/__init__.py contains server code, which makes it impossible to put that file in the python2-bodhi package without pulling in all of the server. Due to this, I've decided to fix this upstream by reorganizing the code. |