| Summary: | No battery detected with Dell 7537 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dominik Gronkiewicz <gronki> |
| Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Kernel Maintainer List <kernel-maint> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 24 | CC: | gansalmon, ichavero, itamar, jonathan, kernel-maint, labbott, madhu.chinakonda, mchehab |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-09-06 16:31:07 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Dominik Gronkiewicz
2016-09-05 01:17:41 UTC
CONFIG_ACPI_REV_OVERRIDE_POSSIBLE is an ugly option. We went through this with sound on the Dell XPS and concluded it's better to keep it off. Your best option is to build a custom kernel and turn it on if you want it. Could you explain why introducing a regression is "less ugly" than allowing users to fix their issues? Is this bug fixed in future kernels? When the option was introduced the first time, there were concerns about it possibly causing issues with secure boot. These issues never panned out but ultimately the option is still playing around with the ACPI version which may have unexpected side effects. The original use was for Dell XPS sound hardware which was lagging behind with I2S support. The issue found here is a BIOS issue which the kernel is exposing. I discussed this with other maintainers and we still want to keep this option off. Turning it on still seems riskier and more prone to unexpected issues. Thank you for your explanation. I noticed that battery indicator stopped working between kernels 4.5 and 4.6 (I can attempt to bisect more precise version). Could it be that the reason is entirely different? I'll try building the kernel with above option turned on and report the results so anyone who encounters the problem can find it on google. Thank you for your explanation. I noticed that battery indicator stopped working between kernels 4.5 and 4.6 (I can attempt to bisect more precise version). Could it be that the reason is entirely different? I'll try building the kernel with above option turned on and report the results so anyone who encounters the problem can find it on google. |