Bug 137322
Summary: | First screen on IA64 rhr2 for rhel4 appears incomplete | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Ready Certification Tests | Reporter: | Glen A. Foster <glen.foster> | ||||
Component: | other | Assignee: | Rob Landry <rlandry> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | beta | CC: | hcp-admin | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | ia64 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2004-12-09 17:51:29 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Glen A. Foster
2004-10-27 15:23:17 UTC
The formatting problems are because of a dialog bug (bz #136374) and are addressed in a newer version of that. I'm curious about the language and garbage characters. What is the value of LANG that causes the garbage characters? # echo $LANG en_US.UTF-8 The -3 of the dialog package appears to be available on ftp:download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/Fedora/RPMS correct for arch or grab the SRPM. Let me know if that doesn't correct it on IPF. Created attachment 105846 [details]
guess patch to address garbage characters
don't have an ia64 w/rhel4 beta on it; an i386 looks ok not great; the above
sets everything a little bright but gives the correct lines etc. As well on
i386 like RHEL3 it looks better in X by default.
Indeed the newer dialog rpm fixes the initial-screen format issue. It did not, however, change the problem in bug 137324 correct; 137324 is a separate bug that has to be fixed should be doubled checked against rhr2-0.9-14.9f Did you mean rhr2-0.9-14.9f as input, or rhr2-rhel4-0.9-14.9f? Either way, where can I get the 0.9-14.9f version to check this? Verified fix in rhr2-rhel4-0.9-14.9f |