Bug 137330
| Summary: | mmaping over NFS: msync(MS_INVALIDATE) does not do anything. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Robert Perkins <rperkins> |
| Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Daniel Riek <riek> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 5.0 | CC: | dff, tao |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2006-02-03 23:42:41 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Robert Perkins
2004-10-27 16:08:51 UTC
From Issue Tracker, which has lots more details: They're requesting that msync(MS_INVALIDATE) work for mmaping over NFS. Requesting engineering scoping for RHEL 2.1 U7. Plenty of details in the corresponding Issue Tracker. Putting on the 2.1 Update 8 Blocker list - Question for PM, do we really want to put features into RHEL2.1 at this point, or is this request really for RHEL4? Looking t this for RHEL5 |