Bug 137335
Summary: | OOo should not depends on both evolution-devel and evolution-data-server-devel | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Leon Ho <llch> |
Component: | openoffice.org | Assignee: | Dan Williams <dcbw> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | dmalcolm |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 1.1.2-11 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-11-11 11:14:37 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Leon Ho
2004-10-27 16:20:43 UTC
I could be wrong though. It's my belief that OO.org merely uses the addressbook part of e-d-s; if it uses other things, such as Evolution's Camel code then I'd like to know! (the latter would be in evolution-devel) done in 1.1.2-11 spec |