| Summary: | Packages don't self-conflict | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | aljosha.papsch <aljosha.papsch> | ||||
| Component: | dnf | Assignee: | rpm-software-management | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 24 | CC: | abokovoy, aljosha.papsch, jsilhan, j, mitch, mluscon, nalin, npmccallum, packaging-team-maint, pnemade, rharwood, rpm-software-management, vmukhame | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened | ||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2016-09-22 06:57:28 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
aljosha.papsch
2016-09-07 07:57:39 UTC
You're trying to use two different versions of krb5 packages. This will never work. Please upgrade and try again. I upgraded packages and installing openssl-devel fails again. I try this on server edition. It runs in a virtual machine because I wanted to compile gvpe for production machines and my desktop runs a different distribution. Today I also installed workstation edition in a virtual machine and installing openssl-devel succeeds including installing libkadm5. I will now compile gvpe and transfer the result to Fedora servers. I guess this bug is invalid; server edition isn't intended for compilation and workstation should be used instead. The current version of krb5 packaging in fedora 24 is 1.14.3-8. If you insist on using krb5-libs-1.14.1-6.fc24.x86_64 I can't guarantee anything will work because that is not the current version. Just had the same issue occur for me. It appears that somehow both versions of krb5-libs were installed at the same time: [mitch@mitch-laptop gr_local]$ rpm -qa | grep krb5-libs krb5-libs-1.14.3-8.fc24.x86_64 krb5-libs-1.14.1-6.fc24.x86_64 I'm not entirely sure why or how that happened, but that explained why a 'dnf upgrade' or any other gyrations about krb5-libs wouldn't upgrade to the 1.14.3-8: $ sudo dnf upgrade Last metadata expiration check: 1:01:26 ago on Wed Sep 21 13:42:53 2016. Dependencies resolved. Nothing to do. Complete! $ dnf list available krb5-libs Last metadata expiration check: 0:50:44 ago on Wed Sep 21 13:53:56 2016. Available Packages krb5-libs.i686 1.14.3-8.fc24 updates $ sudo dnf remove krb5-libs-1.14.1-6.fc24.x86_64 Dependencies resolved. ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Removing: krb5-libs x86_64 1.14.1-6.fc24 @koji-override-0 2.2 M Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Remove 1 Package Installed size: 2.2 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Running transaction check Transaction check succeeded. Running transaction test Transaction test succeeded. Running transaction Erasing : krb5-libs-1.14.1-6.fc24.x86_64 1/1 Verifying : krb5-libs-1.14.1-6.fc24.x86_64 1/1 Removed: krb5-libs.x86_64 1.14.1-6.fc24 Complete! And then, openssl-devel will successfully satisfy its dependencies: $ sudo dnf install openssl-devel Last metadata expiration check: 1:03:58 ago on Wed Sep 21 13:42:53 2016. Dependencies resolved. ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Installing: keyutils-libs-devel x86_64 1.5.9-8.fc24 fedora 46 k krb5-devel x86_64 1.14.3-8.fc24 updates 667 k libcom_err-devel x86_64 1.42.13-4.fc24 fedora 36 k libkadm5 x86_64 1.14.3-8.fc24 updates 170 k libselinux-devel x86_64 2.5-9.fc24 updates 193 k libsepol-devel x86_64 2.5-8.fc24 updates 80 k libverto-devel x86_64 0.2.6-6.fc24 fedora 16 k openssl-devel x86_64 1:1.0.2h-3.fc24 updates 1.5 M Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Install 8 Packages Downloading Packages: [16/1952] [SKIPPED] openssl-devel-1.0.2h-3.fc24.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded [SKIPPED] krb5-devel-1.14.3-8.fc24.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded [SKIPPED] libkadm5-1.14.3-8.fc24.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded [SKIPPED] libselinux-devel-2.5-9.fc24.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded [SKIPPED] libsepol-devel-2.5-8.fc24.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded [SKIPPED] keyutils-libs-devel-1.5.9-8.fc24.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded [SKIPPED] libcom_err-devel-1.42.13-4.fc24.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded [SKIPPED] libverto-devel-0.2.6-6.fc24.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded Running transaction check Transaction check succeeded. Running transaction test Transaction test succeeded. Running transaction Installing : libverto-devel-0.2.6-6.fc24.x86_64 1/8 Installing : libcom_err-devel-1.42.13-4.fc24.x86_64 2/8 Installing : keyutils-libs-devel-1.5.9-8.fc24.x86_64 3/8 Installing : libsepol-devel-2.5-8.fc24.x86_64 4/8 Installing : libselinux-devel-2.5-9.fc24.x86_64 5/8 Installing : libkadm5-1.14.3-8.fc24.x86_64 6/8 Installing : krb5-devel-1.14.3-8.fc24.x86_64 7/8 Installing : openssl-devel-1:1.0.2h-3.fc24.x86_64 8/8 Verifying : openssl-devel-1:1.0.2h-3.fc24.x86_64 1/8 Verifying : krb5-devel-1.14.3-8.fc24.x86_64 2/8 Verifying : libkadm5-1.14.3-8.fc24.x86_64 3/8 Verifying : libselinux-devel-2.5-9.fc24.x86_64 4/8 Verifying : libsepol-devel-2.5-8.fc24.x86_64 5/8 Verifying : keyutils-libs-devel-1.5.9-8.fc24.x86_64 6/8 Verifying : libcom_err-devel-1.42.13-4.fc24.x86_64 7/8 Verifying : libverto-devel-0.2.6-6.fc24.x86_64 8/8 Installed: keyutils-libs-devel.x86_64 1.5.9-8.fc24 krb5-devel.x86_64 1.14.3-8.fc24 libcom_err-devel.x86_64 1.42.13-4.fc24 libkadm5.x86_64 1.14.3-8.fc24 libselinux-devel.x86_64 2.5-9.fc24 libsepol-devel.x86_64 2.5-8.fc24 libverto-devel.x86_64 0.2.6-6.fc24 openssl-devel.x86_64 1:1.0.2h-3.fc24 Complete! Another similar case from Aug 2016: http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=311198 Apparently this is a thing that can just happen. Reassigning to the package manager. Package manager can't do much about this. (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #6) > Package manager can't do much about this. I... what? As far as I can tell the package manager should absolutely prevent two installations of the same package. Why is it sane to do otherwise? (In reply to Robbie Harwood from comment #7) > (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #6) > > Package manager can't do much about this. > > I... what? As far as I can tell the package manager should absolutely > prevent two installations of the same package. Why is it sane to do > otherwise? Well, you can abort transaction (because of electricity problems, Ctrl+c or whatever reason). There is RFE opened to try to automagically restore after such situations, but it's not bug. Created attachment 1203757 [details]
DNF Logfiles
My particular system install isn't very old (Since Sep6). These logs cover just about everything from then.
krb5-libs was upgraded on Sep 7:
dnf.log-20160912:Sep 07 07:58:56 DEBUG ---> Package krb5-libs.x86_64 1.14.1-6.fc24 will be upgraded
dnf.log-20160912:Sep 07 07:58:56 DEBUG ---> Package krb5-libs.x86_64 1.14.3-8.fc24 will be an upgrade
dnf.log-20160912: krb5-libs x86_64 1.14.3-8.fc24 updates 738 k
dnf.log-20160912:Sep 07 07:59:09 SUBDEBUG drpm: spawned 2910: /usr/bin/applydeltarpm -a x86_64 /var/cache/dnf/updates-c4f1c95f64c2b794/packages/krb5-libs-1.14.1-6.fc24_1.14.3-8.fc24.x86_64.drpm /var/cache/dnf/updates-c4f1c95f64c2b794/packages/krb5-libs-1.14.3-8.fc24.x86_64.rpm
dnf.log-20160912:Sep 07 08:07:25 DDEBUG /var/cache/dnf/updates-c4f1c95f64c2b794/packages/krb5-libs-1.14.3-8.fc24.x86_64.rpm removed
Just a note that installing multiple versions of the same package is perfectly well supported by RPM and certainly used by pretty much every Fedora installation (by the kernel package). There are plenty of other places where this would be useful. DNF will generally refuse to install multiple versions of non-kernel packages. But that doesn't mean that there aren't other ways to do it, and once it's there DNF may not have the best behavior, especially if it only happened because a machine rebooted in the middle of an update or if the user forced RPM to install a package (with --nodeps or the like). |