| Summary: | /usr/bin/ld.gold: noexecheap: unknown -z option | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Harald Reindl <h.reindl> |
| Component: | binutils | Assignee: | Nick Clifton <nickc> |
| Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 24 | CC: | davejohansen, jakub, jwakely, law, mpolacek, nickc |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-08-08 17:11:42 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Harald Reindl
2016-09-08 11:54:19 UTC
If you want to use gold, you should be aware that it isn't 100% compatible with the GNU bfd linker and not even 100% option compatible. well, you need gold for lto BTW: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=796116 would you please start to provide matching libtool-builds so that gcc candidates become installable for willing testers? otherwise you just can stop build newer gcc versions at all (In reply to Harald Reindl from comment #2) > well, you need gold for lto No you don't. > BTW: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=796116 > would you please start to provide matching libtool-builds so that gcc > candidates become installable for willing testers? otherwise you just can > stop build newer gcc versions at all That's an overreaction. overreaction?
each time i see a gcc build in the last years i am stupid enough to download all the subpackages to find out again that they are not installable (probably i am on top in context of the amount self-built packages of non-fedora-packages and can fire up a ton of builds which cross-deps by one script call)
gcc-6.2.1-1.fc24 - 2016-09-03
Error: Package: libtool-2.4.6-11.fc24.x86_64 (installed)
Requires: gcc = 6.1.1
Removing: gcc-6.1.1-3.fc24.x86_64 (installed)
gcc = 6.1.1-3.fc24
Updated By: gcc-6.2.1-1.fc24.x86_64 (/gcc-6.2.1-1.fc24.x86_64)
gcc = 6.2.1-1.fc24
I'm building new libtool when about to file a new bodhi request. I don't plan to do it in this case, because some changes broke va_list in C++ and so that needs to be fixed first. thanks for the feedback - would have been nice at bodhi https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-95013ec797 This message is a reminder that Fedora 24 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 2 (two) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 24. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '24'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 24 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. Fedora 24 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2017-08-08. Fedora 24 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |