Bug 1374450

Summary:	Compliance check history isn't shown if compliance policy is unconditional
Product:	Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine	Reporter:	Satoe Imaishi <simaishi>
Component:	Control	Assignee:	Lucy Fu <lufu>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Dmitry Misharov <dmisharo>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	5.6.0	CC:	dajohnso, dmisharo, jhardy, mfeifer, obarenbo, simaishi
Target Milestone:	GA	Keywords:	ZStream
Target Release:	5.6.2
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:	control:ui
Fixed In Version:	5.6.2.0	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	Previously, compliance check history wasn't shown if the compliance policy was unconditional. This occurred because a compliance detail record is required to display the compliance check history. With this fix, CloudForms now creates a compliance detail record for unconditional compliance policies, and the history is shown.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	1369488	Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-10-04 14:36:23 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	Unknown	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1369488
Bug Blocks:

Comment 2 Dmitry Misharov 2016-09-14 12:42:39 UTC

I still can reproduce the issue. Tested on 5.6.2.0.20160913114355_70e9086. Compliance status and history is not shown in the web ui after compliance checking if a compliance policy is unconditional.

Comment 3 Lucy Fu 2016-09-14 13:15:18 UTC

Dmitry,

Can I take a look at your testing environment? 
Please send me the credentials of your server, if possible.

Comment 5 Dmitry Misharov 2016-09-14 13:21:51 UTC

Sorry, Lucy it was a mistake. The bug is verified in 5.6.2.0.20160913114355_70e9086

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2016-10-04 14:36:23 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1996.html