| Summary: | package owns /etc/bash_completion.d but it should not own it | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Germano Massullo <germano.massullo> |
| Component: | drush | Assignee: | Shawn Iwinski <shawn> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | germano.massullo, shawn |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-11-02 13:24:49 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
You may also be interested in reading https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303441#c1 I am unclear as to the exact "fix" for this and which dists to push the change to. Is there a packaging guideline you can refer me to? https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/6CEBPSYCHIGACH2HV3XOVYHPMQDAJG4X/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership I read that first thread which was unclear and is still unclear. I know the packaging guidelines for directory ownership. I still have the question of which dists? All of them? -- i.e. EPEL 6, EPEL 7, F23, F24, F25, and rawhide? |
Description of problem: The package owns /etc/bash_completion.d directory that is already owned by "filesystem" package. Problem triggered by line %dir %{_sysconfdir}/bash_completion.d at http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/drush.git/tree/drush.spec#n309 You can fix it by replacing it with %dir %{_sysconfdir}/bash_completion.d/%{name}