Bug 1376206

Summary: Document new showpaths option of multipathd
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Steven J. Levine <slevine>
Component: doc-DM_MultipathAssignee: Steven J. Levine <slevine>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: ecs-bugs
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.9CC: adstrong, agk, bdonahue, bmarzins, dwysocha, ecs-bugs, heinzm, lilin, msnitzer, prajnoha, prockai, rbalakri, rhel-docs, scott.rochford, zkabelac
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Documentation
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1303770 Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-01-25 15:05:08 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On: 1145442, 1303770    
Bug Blocks: 1299651, 1310185    

Comment 1 Steven J. Levine 2016-09-14 21:05:43 UTC
This bug is only about these options:

Also, starting in RHEL-7.3 and RHEL-6.9 (not the upcoming RHEL6 release, the one after it), there will be two additional commands

list|show pathgroups format $format
list|show pathgroups raw format $format

To display pathgroup information.

Comment 2 Steven J. Levine 2016-09-26 20:37:44 UTC
As an update: Those new options did not make 7.3, but it's not clear whether they will make 6.9.

Comment 3 Steven J. Levine 2017-01-24 21:51:34 UTC
Ben:

I don't think I have a record of whether or not these options for multipathd will make RHEL 6.9:

list|show pathgroups format $format
list|show pathgroups raw format $format

To display pathgroup information.

Is this something I can close out?

Steven

Comment 4 Ben Marzinski 2017-01-25 09:41:38 UTC
No. These changes never got accepted.

Comment 5 Ben Marzinski 2017-01-25 12:01:12 UTC
and by "No", I mean "Yes". You can close this out.

Comment 6 Steven J. Levine 2017-01-25 15:05:08 UTC
Closing this as not a bug as per Comment 5.