Bug 1377679

Summary: satellite_url is not replaced in various emails
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Maxim Burgerhout <mburgerh>
Component: BrandingAssignee: satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Marek Hulan <mhulan>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 6.2.2CC: amdas, bbuckingham, bkearney, dhlavacd, jcallaha, mhulan, rplevka, sshtein, stbenjam
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: Reopened, Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-02-21 16:54:37 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
satellite_url none

Description Maxim Burgerhout 2016-09-20 11:13:07 UTC 
Created attachment 1202855 [details]
satellite_url

Description of problem:
Various emails sent out to Satellite 6 users have a %{satellite_url} variable, that is not replaced properly.

One example is the Puppet Summary Report, but I'm quite sure the problem in bug 1328507 is the same, though it's component is 'SCAP Plugin'

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
6.2.2

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Subscribe to Puppet Summary emails
2. Receive one
3.

Actual results:
Header reads:
"Summary report from Satellite server at %{satellite_url}

Expected results:
Header should read:
"Summary report from Satellite server at satellite6.example.com"


Additional info:
Screenshot attached. This happens to various emails - not just the Puppet Summary ones - and looks quite unprofessional.
Comment 5 Stephen Benjamin 2017-03-30 16:58:14 UTC 
*** Bug 1432300 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Bryan Kearney 2017-03-31 16:36:46 UTC 
This is not aligned to 6.2, and as Shlomi mentioned it is due to an older branding process not used in 6.3. I will move this to ON_QA for 6.3.
Comment 15 Bryan Kearney 2017-05-10 12:56:22 UTC 
We seem to be good here.
Comment 16 Marek Hulan 2017-06-29 10:49:42 UTC 
*** Bug 1328507 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18 Satellite Program 2018-02-21 16:54:37 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA.
> > 
> > For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below.
> > 
> > If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
> > 
> > https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0336