Bug 1378862

Summary: Deployment: Subscription fields in dialogue are not clear
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine Reporter: Dafna Ron <dron>
Component: ProvidersAssignee: Barak <bazulay>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Einat Pacifici <epacific>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 5.7.0CC: bazulay, cpelland, epacific, fsimonce, gblomqui, jfrey, jhardy, obarenbo, simaishi
Target Milestone: GAFlags: dajohnso: needinfo? (epacific)
Target Release: cfme-future   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: container
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-12-26 15:35:29 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: Container Management Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
screen shot none

Description Dafna Ron 2016-09-23 11:50:26 UTC
Created attachment 1204112 [details]
screen shot

Description of problem:

looking at the subscription dialogue of "add new provider: 
I am not sure what: SKU means (this is not a general pool name is it?)  
do we specify a pool? do we specify specific channels? 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

using upstream master/origin hash b2414903aa11
alon's updates merged

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. compute -> containers -> providers -> add new provider
2. select CDN channel tab 
3. 

Actual results:

it is unclear what to add in SKU

Expected results:

the fields name should be consistent to the subscription-manager command to avoid confutation 
example, if subscription manager has these commands: 

 subscription-manager attach --pool


we should have fields that say: 

pool id: 


Additional info: screen shot

Comment 1 Dave Johnson 2017-07-14 03:51:28 UTC
Please assess the importance of this issue and update the priority accordingly.  Somewhere it was missed in the bug triage process.  Please refer to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#priority for a reminder on each priority's definition.

If it's something like a tracker bug where it doesn't matter, please set it to Low/Low.

Comment 2 Barak 2017-12-26 15:35:29 UTC
Closing this bug as the cluster deployment feature was shelved long time ago