Bug 1378995

Summary: [RFE] [rhcs-1.3.x] RGW resharding tool
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda>
Component: RGWAssignee: Matt Benjamin (redhat) <mbenjamin>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: ceph-qe-bugs <ceph-qe-bugs>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 1.3.3CC: bancinco, cbodley, ceph-eng-bugs, hnallurv, kbader, kdreyer, mbenjamin, mhackett, nlevine, owasserm, smanjara, sweil, tmuthami, tserlin, vumrao, yehuda
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: 1.3.4   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHEL: ceph-0.94.9-4.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_0.94.9-5redhat1 Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
With this update, it is possible to change the maximum number shards per bucket. This is especially useful when bucket sharding was not configured correctly.
 Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1380601 1399089 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-01 21:38:52 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1394936, 1399089    

Description Yehuda Sadeh 2016-09-23 20:08:02 UTC 
Description of problem:

Need a tool that reshards bucket indexes.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 20 shilpa 2016-11-27 06:51:28 UTC 
The resharding command parameter should be --num-shards. There is no '--max-shards' parameter.

$ radosgw-admin bucket reshard --bucket=<bucket name>
--num-shards=<new shards number>
Comment 23 shilpa 2016-11-29 08:38:59 UTC 
Verified on ceph-0.94.9-7
Comment 25 errata-xmlrpc 2016-12-01 21:38:52 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2847.html