| Summary: | Sigil package lacks a dependency on minizip | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Adam Hunt <voxadam> |
| Component: | sigil | Assignee: | Hans de Goede <hdegoede> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 26 | CC: | dan, hdegoede |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-07-24 11:49:01 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Adam Hunt
2016-09-25 12:01:18 UTC
The sigil has correct dependencies set - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=7955020 - and dnf should resolve them during install. What does "dnf history info sigil" and "rpm -qi sigil" says? I apologize for not replying earlier. These outputs are from a somewhat recently installed Fedora 25 workstation.
[adam@drogon]~% sudo dnf history info sigil
Transaction ID : 102
Begin time : Fri Dec 30 04:55:39 2016
Begin rpmdb : 2134:4d96699a3e965d6cf13a2c2e7d031bfdfc679be6
End time : 04:55:42 2016 (3 seconds)
End rpmdb : 2139:f28631057c76087f7fd18c0f5145665978d1c691
User : adam <adam>
Return-Code : Success
Command Line : install sigil
Transaction performed with:
Installed dnf-1.1.10-4.fc25.noarch @updates
Installed rpm-4.13.0-6.fc25.x86_64 @updates
Packages Altered:
Install FlightCrew-sigil-plugin-0.9.1-3.fc25.x86_64 @fedora
Install python3-cssutils-1.0.1-5.fc25.noarch @fedora
Install python3-regex-2016.09.22-1.fc25.x86_64 @fedora
Install sigil-0.9.6-1.fc25.x86_64 @fedora
Install zipios++-0.1.5.9-15.fc24.x86_64 @fedora
[adam@drogon]~%
[adam@drogon]~% sudo rpm -qi sigil
Name : sigil
Version : 0.9.6
Release : 1.fc25
Architecture: x86_64
Install Date: Fri 30 Dec 2016 04:55:41 AM PST
Group : Unspecified
Size : 13976372
License : GPLv3+
Signature : RSA/SHA256, Mon 15 Aug 2016 10:15:52 AM PDT, Key ID 4089d8f2fdb19c98
Source RPM : sigil-0.9.6-1.fc25.src.rpm
Build Date : Fri 12 Aug 2016 03:49:05 AM PDT
Build Host : buildvm-21.phx2.fedoraproject.org
Relocations : (not relocatable)
Packager : Fedora Project
Vendor : Fedora Project
URL : https://sigil-ebook.com/
Summary : WYSIWYG ebook editor
Description :
Sigil is a multi-platform WYSIWYG ebook editor. It is designed to edit books
in ePub format.
Now what does it have to offer...
* Full Unicode support: everything you see in Sigil is in UTF-16
* Full EPUB spec support
* WYSIWYG editing
* Multiple Views: Book View, Code View and Split View
* Metadata editor with full support for all possible metadata entries with
full descriptions for each
* Table Of Contents editor
* Multi-level TOC support
* Book View fully supports the display of any XHTML document possible under
the OPS spec
* SVG support
* Basic XPGT support
* Advanced automatic conversion of all imported documents to Unicode
* Currently imports TXT, HTML and EPUB files; more will be added with time
* Embedded HTML Tidy; all imported documents are thoroughly cleaned;
changing views cleans the document so no matter how much you screw up
your code, it will fix it (usually)
[adam@drogon]~%
Adam, Can you please run: rpm -q --requires sigil and: rpm --verify sigil And post the output of both here ? Regards, Hans My guess is that there is another package that (incorrectly) provides libminizip.so.1 on the rpm level, but this is a private copy not available in /usr/lib64. It should be like [dan@eagle ~]$ locate libminizip.so.1 /usr/lib64/libminizip.so.1 /usr/lib64/libminizip.so.1.0.0 [dan@eagle ~]$ rpm -q --whatprovides 'libminizip.so.1()(64bit)' minizip-1.2.8-10.fc24.x86_64 This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 26 development cycle. Changing version to '26'. Admittedly limited testing points to this no longer being an issue, if it ever was. Closing |