Bug 1379151

Summary: [RFE] - QoS dialog should contain more context sensitive help for the options.
Product: [oVirt] ovirt-engine Reporter: Yaniv Lavi <ylavi>
Component: Frontend.WebAdminAssignee: eraviv
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED QA Contact: Lukas Svaty <lsvaty>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.0.4CC: bugs, danken, dfediuck, rbarry
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature, Improvement
Target Release: ---Flags: rbarry: ovirt-4.5?
rule-engine: planning_ack?
rule-engine: devel_ack?
rule-engine: testing_ack?
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-04-01 14:46:43 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: Virt RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Yaniv Lavi 2016-09-25 12:48:14 UTC
Description of problem:
QoS dialog should contain more context sensitive help for the options. Options like CPU shares, capping and link sharing are not clear and some info can really help with admin decisions and not needing the docs for every action.

Comment 1 Yaniv Kaul 2018-05-21 10:45:26 UTC
Dan - please target or close.

Comment 2 Dan Kenigsberg 2018-05-29 08:47:49 UTC
Eitan, you wanted to improve QoS UX. Would you discuss the subject with ylavi?

Comment 3 Red Hat Bugzilla Rules Engine 2018-05-29 08:47:55 UTC
This request has been proposed for two releases. This is invalid flag usage. The ovirt-future release flag has been cleared. If you wish to change the release flag, you must clear one release flag and then set the other release flag to ?.

Comment 4 Michal Skrivanek 2020-03-17 12:16:59 UTC
deprecating SLA team usage, moving to Virt

Comment 5 Michal Skrivanek 2020-03-19 15:40:50 UTC
We didn't get to this bug for more than 2 years, and it's not being considered for the upcoming 4.4. It's unlikely that it will ever be addressed so I'm suggesting to close it.
If you feel this needs to be addressed and want to work on it please remove cond nack and target accordingly.

Comment 6 Michal Skrivanek 2020-04-01 14:46:43 UTC
Closing old bug. Please reopen if still relevant/you want to work on it.