Bug 1379264

Summary:	RHEVH 3.6 7.3 should be with the latest rhel 7.3 beta snapshot 5
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager	Reporter:	jianwu <jiawu>
Component:	rhev-hypervisor-ng	Assignee:	Joey Boggs <jboggs>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Yihui Zhao <yzhao>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	unspecified	CC:	amarchuk, bmcclain, bugs, cshao, danken, dfediuck, dguo, dougsland, fdeutsch, gklein, huzhao, jiawu, leiwang, mgoldboi, michal.skrivanek, weiwang, yaniwang, ycui, yzhao
Target Milestone:	ovirt-3.6.10	Keywords:	ZStream
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	rhev-hypervisor7-7.3-20161007.0	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-01-23 14:24:29 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	Node	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description jianwu 2016-09-26 08:57:18 UTC

Description of problem:
rhevh 7.3 should be with the latest rhel 7.3 beta snapshot 5,the kernel version and libvirt version are not with rhel 7.3 beta snapshot 5.

kernel-3.10.0-506.el7.x86_64
libvirt-2.0.0-9.el7.x86_64


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHEV-H 7.3-20160923.2.el7ev


How reproducible:
100%


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install RHEV-H 7.3-20160923.2.el7ev
2. rpm -qa |grep kernel
3. rpm -qa |grep libvirt

Actual results:
The kernel and libvirt version on RHEVH 7.3-3.6.10
kernel-3.10.0-506.el7.x86_64
libvirt-2.0.0-9.el7.x86_64
The kernel and libvirt version in errata don't match to.


Expected results:
rhevh 7.3 should be with the latest rhel 7.3 beta snapshot 5



Additional info:
snapshot 5 released Sep 22

Comment 1 Red Hat Bugzilla Rules Engine 2016-09-26 08:57:30 UTC

Bug tickets must have version flags set prior to targeting them to a release. Please ask maintainer to set the correct version flags and only then set the target milestone.

Comment 2 Red Hat Bugzilla Rules Engine 2016-09-26 08:57:30 UTC

Target release should be placed once a package build is known to fix a issue. Since this bug is not modified, the target version has been reset. Please use target milestone to plan a fix for a oVirt release.

Comment 7 Yihui Zhao 2016-10-13 05:43:02 UTC

Hi all,
    the bug is not exist on RHVH4.0.0-20161007.

The packages if possible:
qemu-kvm-rhev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.21.x86_64
kernel-3.10.0-512.el7.x86_64
rhvh-4.0-0.20161007.0+1

Thanks,
Yihui

Comment 8 Yihui Zhao 2016-10-13 06:24:51 UTC

(In reply to Yihui Zhao from comment #7)
> Hi all,
>     the bug is not exist on RHVH4.0.0-20161007.
> 
> The packages if possible:
> qemu-kvm-rhev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.21.x86_64
> kernel-3.10.0-512.el7.x86_64
> rhvh-4.0-0.20161007.0+1
> 
> Thanks,
> Yihui

Sorry,ingore the comment 7.
and the correct comment is here:
 
The bug is not exist on RHEV-H 7.3-20161007.0.el7ev.

Comment 9 Douglas Schilling Landgraf 2016-10-13 19:46:56 UTC

(In reply to Yihui Zhao from comment #8)
> (In reply to Yihui Zhao from comment #7)
> > Hi all,
> >     the bug is not exist on RHVH4.0.0-20161007.
> > 
> > The packages if possible:
> > qemu-kvm-rhev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.21.x86_64
> > kernel-3.10.0-512.el7.x86_64
> > rhvh-4.0-0.20161007.0+1
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Yihui
> 
> Sorry,ingore the comment 7.
> and the correct comment is here:
>  
> The bug is not exist on RHEV-H 7.3-20161007.0.el7ev.

If it's all set, could we move the bug to VERIFIED? 

Thanks!

Comment 10 Yihui Zhao 2016-10-14 01:39:47 UTC

(In reply to Douglas Schilling Landgraf from comment #9)
> (In reply to Yihui Zhao from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Yihui Zhao from comment #7)
> > > Hi all,
> > >     the bug is not exist on RHVH4.0.0-20161007.
> > > 
> > > The packages if possible:
> > > qemu-kvm-rhev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.21.x86_64
> > > kernel-3.10.0-512.el7.x86_64
> > > rhvh-4.0-0.20161007.0+1
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Yihui
> > 
> > Sorry,ingore the comment 7.
> > and the correct comment is here:
> >  
> > The bug is not exist on RHEV-H 7.3-20161007.0.el7ev.
> 
> If it's all set, could we move the bug to VERIFIED? 
> 
> Thanks!

Yes,OK.

Comment 11 Huijuan Zhao 2016-10-14 05:47:56 UTC

According to comment 8, we will set the status to VERIFIED after the status changes to ON_QA.
Thanks!