| Summary: | [RFE]VMware thick disk format provisioning | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine | Reporter: | Leo Khomenko <lkhomenk> | ||||||||
| Component: | Providers | Assignee: | John Hardy <jhardy> | ||||||||
| Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Dave Johnson <dajohnso> | ||||||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||||||
| Version: | 5.6.0 | CC: | dajohnso, jfrey, jhardy, kkulkarn, lcouzens, obarenbo | ||||||||
| Target Milestone: | GA | Keywords: | FutureFeature | ||||||||
| Target Release: | cfme-future | ||||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | vsphere:vm:provision | ||||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2019-03-11 18:41:34 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | CFME Core | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||
Created attachment 1206303 [details]
vCenter screen
Created attachment 1206304 [details]
request screen
I tested a number of scenarios and wasn't able to reproduce this. I created two templates, one with a thick prov disk and one with a thin prov disk. I then provisioned VMs from these through MIQ and switched the provision type on the hardware tab and confirmed it honored the disk format set in the provision dialog. I did this for both vSphere 5.5 and vSphere 6.0 and all VMs ended up being provisioned correctly. Can you set the log level and level_vim to debug and reproduce? Also can you try the same thing but using just the vSphere web client to make sure it isn't just that the datastore doesn't support thick provisioned disks (e.g.: NFS) yes, Adam is totally right. if data-storage is not available for thick disk provisioning it would be great to have additional notification/check/warning on if selected selected Disk type fits Data-storage Can/should we do this? Thanks Leo, when you provision a VM from a template you can set the virtual disk format just like in MIQ. If the target datastore is an NFS share the only option is Thin Provisioned, it would be great to do the same thing in the MIQ provision dialog. If we can find where this capability is stored and add it to inventory then we can filter the options for that dropdown. *** Bug 1430361 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** I chose a template that was thin provisioned and provisioned a VM with it, while setting disk to be "Thick" provisioned. It worked fine. I am closing this BZ. Tested on 5.10.1.2.20190219165527_7a4a22b |
Created attachment 1206302 [details] CFME screen Description of problem:impossible to provision VM with thick disk. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible:100% Steps to Reproduce: 1.add vsphere provider 2.create Vm provision request with Thick Disk Format selected(on hardware tab) 3.Check Vm after request is completed Actual results: Thin Provisioning used = True Expected results: False Additional info: