Bug 1380847

Summary: atomic containers delete --all useless error message
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Chris Evich <cevich>
Component: atomicAssignee: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: atomic-bugs <atomic-bugs>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.3CC: ajia, dwalsh
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Extras
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-06 17:42:03 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Chris Evich 2016-09-30 18:42:32 UTC
Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
atomic-1.12.3-2.el7.x86_64
docker-1.10.3-55.el7.x86_64

How reproducible:
highly

Steps to Reproduce:
1. # for n in $(seq 1 6); do docker run -d --name rhel${n} rhel sleep ${n}h; done
2. atomic containers delete --all

Actual results:
'Type'
(exit code 1)

Expected results:
A useful error message that some or all containers could not be deleted because they are still running.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Chris Evich 2016-09-30 18:44:08 UTC
Note: Same behavior with or without the --force option.

Comment 3 Alex Jia 2016-10-08 09:43:12 UTC
It seems I can get an expected error like this "Conflict, You cannot remove a running container. Stop the container before attempting removal or use -f".

[root@atomic-host-001 cloud-user]# cat /etc/redhat-release 
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Atomic Host release 7.3
[root@atomic-host-001 cloud-user]# rpm -q atomic docker 
atomic-1.12.5-2.el7.x86_64
docker-1.10.3-55.el7.x86_64

Comment 4 Alex Jia 2016-10-10 08:47:41 UTC
This bug has been fixed in Atomic Host 7.3.

[root@atomic-host-001 cloud-user]# cat /etc/redhat-release 
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Atomic Host release 7.3

[root@atomic-host-001 cloud-user]# rpm -q atomic docker
atomic-1.12.5-2.el7.x86_64
docker-1.10.3-55.el7.x86_64

[root@atomic-host-001 cloud-user]# for i in {1..6};do docker run -itd --name busybox_$i busybox /bin/sh;done
48e7f3df0e2ad045c5c0191d60a0f6339350a498ec52ad2200b284ef2b373246
532cd20166f4c3362e4722511858e80fa550361a33c8e1745219ecb2417e5168
42df365b2ba9910df1a9b865ef386b2fbd3d2d85e8094e69f15cdf7933c68b15
0eeff89145b79d0f72b77f464f71223e2ef41643749d4818703318aa33351d66
8992c6b7934c0c65273956a245b946016a71ee93639cbc4bb94d8635b25c1466
5f85260bc00509597c95cea6cd41af1768cbf3c3fd4e061adcee6011a34c3e2b

[root@atomic-host-001 cloud-user]# docker ps
CONTAINER ID        IMAGE               COMMAND             CREATED             STATUS              PORTS               NAMES
5f85260bc005        busybox             "/bin/sh"           5 seconds ago       Up 3 seconds                            busybox_6
8992c6b7934c        busybox             "/bin/sh"           7 seconds ago       Up 5 seconds                            busybox_5
0eeff89145b7        busybox             "/bin/sh"           9 seconds ago       Up 7 seconds                            busybox_4
42df365b2ba9        busybox             "/bin/sh"           10 seconds ago      Up 9 seconds                            busybox_3
532cd20166f4        busybox             "/bin/sh"           12 seconds ago      Up 10 seconds                           busybox_2
48e7f3df0e2a        busybox             "/bin/sh"           13 seconds ago      Up 12 seconds                           busybox_1

[root@atomic-host-001 cloud-user]# atomic containers delete -f --all

[root@atomic-host-001 cloud-user]# docker ps -a
CONTAINER ID        IMAGE               COMMAND             CREATED             STATUS              PORTS               NAMES

Comment 5 Daniel Walsh 2016-10-10 14:47:29 UTC
Fixed in  atomic -1.13

Comment 7 Alex Jia 2016-10-28 09:32:59 UTC
It also works in atomic-1.13.3-1.el7.x86_64.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2016-12-06 17:42:03 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2857.html