Bug 1380854

Summary:	"Indepedent selinux policy" project (internal) documentation
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7	Reporter:	Lukas Vrabec <lvrabec>
Component:	selinux-policy	Assignee:	Lukas Vrabec <lvrabec>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Milos Malik <mmalik>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:	Mirek Jahoda <mjahoda>
Priority:	high
Version:	7.4	CC:	ksrot, lvrabec, mgrepl, mmalik, plautrba, pvrabec, rkratky, ssekidde
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Tracking
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	1465824 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-08-01 15:15:11 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1393066
Bug Blocks:	1377248, 1465824

Comment 1 Lukas Vrabec 2017-03-13 15:50:22 UTC

Documentation part: 
https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-1131234 

Technical backround will be part of selinux-policy-3.13.1-128.el7 build. 
http://pkgs.devel.redhat.com/cgit/rpms/selinux-policy/commit/?h=rhel-7.4&id=1eeb9228fae08aa89899ceb0a858adb2d8c9e54c

In next days Kbase article will be created.

Comment 2 Milos Malik 2017-03-14 14:25:31 UTC

Looking into /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.selinux-policy file, which belongs to selinux-policy-3.13.1-129.el7.noarch package, following discrepancies were found:

* both echo and /bin/echo are used, is it intentional?
* %selinux_modules_uninstall macro is able to take [-s <policytype>] as parameter, but the value of <policytype> is ignored, because semodule is executed without appropriate -s parameter

Comment 4 Milos Malik 2017-06-28 06:52:05 UTC

Problems described in comment#2 still hold.

Comment 5 Milos Malik 2017-06-28 09:56:16 UTC

The problems described in comment#2 are filed separately as BZ#1465824 and will be handled in RHEL-7.5.

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2017-08-01 15:15:11 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:1861