Bug 1382071

Summary:	[SuperLUMT] use bundled CBLAS on s390x instead of openblas
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Dan Horák <dan>
Component:	SuperLUMT	Assignee:	Antonio T. (sagitter) <anto.trande>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	anto.trande, nonamedotc
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	s390x
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	SuperLUMT-3.1.0-8.fc25 SuperLUMT-3.1.0-8.fc24 SuperLUMT-3.1.0-8.fc23	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-10-10 17:42:48 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	467765

Description Dan Horák 2016-10-05 16:28:18 UTC

Currently sundials switched to require SuperLUMT, breaking the build on s390x due the lack of SuperLUMT there. But if I read the SuperLUMT README correctly, it's possible to use the bundled CBLAS if there no faster BLAS library available.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
SuperLUMT-3.1.0-7.fc26

Comment 1 Antonio T. (sagitter) 2016-10-05 19:39:34 UTC

Hi Dan.

Do you prefer bundled CBLAS than 'blas' (http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=414810) ?

Comment 2 Dan Horák 2016-10-05 19:48:00 UTC

(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #1)
> Hi Dan.
> 
> Do you prefer bundled CBLAS than 'blas'
> (http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=414810) ?

I guess I should prefer blas from the lapack package over CBLAS :-) Please pick whatever you think is better.

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2016-10-06 20:58:57 UTC

SuperLUMT-3.1.0-8.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-c2f2523612

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2016-10-07 09:25:24 UTC

SuperLUMT-3.1.0-8.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ffafdf7665

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2016-10-07 09:58:51 UTC

SuperLUMT-3.1.0-8.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-87dd3e82b3

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2016-10-10 17:42:48 UTC

SuperLUMT-3.1.0-8.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2016-10-15 02:50:24 UTC

SuperLUMT-3.1.0-8.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2016-10-15 05:50:40 UTC

SuperLUMT-3.1.0-8.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.