Bug 1382501

Summary:	Differences in Install guide and install script
Product:	Red Hat Satellite 5	Reporter:	Diogo Henrique <diogo.henrique>
Component:	Installer	Assignee:	Jan Dobes <jdobes>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Red Hat Satellite QA List <satqe-list>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	570	CC:	tlestach
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-10-07 14:36:58 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Diogo Henrique 2016-10-06 20:12:19 UTC

Description of problem:

In Satellite 5.7 documentation (https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Satellite/5.7/pdf/Installation_Guide/Red_Hat_Satellite-5.7-Installation_Guide-en-US.pdf), it explains the embedded database path do database change from /var/lib/pgsql (Wich is default in Satellite 5.6) to /opt/rh/postgresql92/root/var/lib/pgsql/.

But during running the installation script, it validates if we had enough space in /var/lib/pgsql, considering 12 gib free to follow installation (Default for /opt/rh/postgresql92/root/var/lib/pgsql/). I've grow my / filesystem to accommodate 12 gib and install satellite. During satellite-sync, i've notice the database are growing in /opt/rh/postgresql92/root/var/lib/pgsql/, so is the installation script wrong ?


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 5.7


How reproducible:

Yes


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Just try to install Satellite, downloading ISO from RedHat Access Portal
2.
3.

Actual results:

It try to validate the /var/lib path with enough space, not opt one, but during Satellite operation, it uses /opt


Expected results:

Install script should validate the /opt path with enough free/available space


Additional info:

RedHat Case Open, number 01716918

Comment 1 Tomas Lestach 2016-10-07 14:36:58 UTC

Right, there's a problem. This sounds like a duplicate of Bug 1187085.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1187085 ***