| Summary: | [DOCS] Documentation inaccurate for docker-registry-console certificate security | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Jaspreet Kaur <jkaur> |
| Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | brice <bfallonf> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Yadan Pei <yapei> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | Vikram Goyal <vigoyal> |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 3.3.0 | CC: | aos-bugs, jkaur, jokerman, mmccomas |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-02-09 01:16:18 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Jaspreet Kaur
2016-10-07 06:58:46 UTC
Jaspreet, I've created a PR from this: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/3555 I was confused by what you meant above, but the customer case made it clearer. But because of that, can I ask if what Iv'e done fulfills this BZ? I've put the info from the troubleshooting topic into the steps when securing the registry, and because the .cert and .key info is in the same file, I've got rid of the option adding the .key to the registry secret. Please let me know if this is not what you intended. Thanks. Brice, Yes this looks correct. Thanks Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/commit/7d32bf2b349e618b9e959adf9518d3b8cddf55c5 Merge pull request #3555 from bfallonf/certs_1382599 Bug 1382599 arranged section on certs and the registry console Thanks, Jaspreet. Putting this to Release_pending |