| Summary: | ceph-ansible v1.0.8 lacks "ceph_stable_rh_storage" | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Storage Console | Reporter: | Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) <kdreyer> |
| Component: | ceph-ansible | Assignee: | Sébastien Han <shan> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | ceph-qe-bugs <ceph-qe-bugs> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 2 | CC: | adeza, aschoen, ceph-eng-bugs, gmeno, nthomas, sankarshan, seb |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 3 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-01-11 23:05:55 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Ken Dreyer (Red Hat)
2016-10-10 15:26:08 UTC
Even if it's disruptive, it's probably easier to rewrite the doc and ship a new version for ceph-installer. I can potentially implement a backward compatibility in 1.0.8 so let me know which solution you prefer. Personally I think we should preserve backwards compatibility, at least for the "ceph-ansible v1" release series. can we have someone testing this branch? for both CDN and ISO install? https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/pull/1032 Thanks! We never shipped v1.0.8, and v2.1.1 has the backwards-compatible variables, so I think we're good here. |