| Summary: | CPUFREQ empty | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Nicolas R. <nicolas> |
| Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Kernel Maintainer List <kernel-maint> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 24 | CC: | gansalmon, ichavero, itamar, jonathan, kernel-maint, madhu.chinakonda, mchehab, nicolas, pbrobinson |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-11-20 12:56:56 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 245418 | ||
|
Description
Nicolas R.
2016-10-11 15:57:26 UTC
Can you see if you can work out where it disappeared? Was it there for the 4.6.x kernel series? Of course. Following kernels here https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/kernel/ The 4.6.7-300 doesn't work too. Trying other one and tell you here asap. Working on last 4.5.x for FC24 (4.5.7-300). Not working on first 4.6 for FC24 (4.6.3-300) So it was lost on 4.6 :( https://paste.fedoraproject.org/450440/14765313/ So there's nothing specific to cpufreq that's changed between those kernel configs. The expected module (cpufreq-dt.ko) is still there. So the question is what else has changed... I think this should now be fixed with kernel-4.8.4-200.fc24 $ cat /sys/bus/cpu/devices/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor ondemand $ cat /sys/bus/cpu/devices/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_cur_freq 350000 $ cat /sys/bus/cpu/devices/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_max_freq 920000 Cannot try my bananapi is not available :( |