Bug 1384271
Summary: | When refreshing manifest it takes long periods of time when you have more than 100+ subscriptions | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Kathryn Dixon <kdixon> | ||||||
Component: | Subscription Management | Assignee: | Walden Raines <walden> | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Christine Fouant <cfouant> | ||||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||||
Version: | 6.2.2 | CC: | bbuckingham, bkearney, cfouant, jcallaha, kdixon, oshtaier, pdwyer, smercurio, sthirugn, walden | ||||||
Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | PrioBumpGSS, PrioBumpQA, Triaged, UserExperience | ||||||
Target Release: | Unused | Flags: | smercurio:
needinfo?
|
||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||
Fixed In Version: | tfm-rubygem-katello-3.4.4 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
Last Closed: | 2018-02-21 16:45:17 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Kathryn Dixon
2016-10-13 00:47:35 UTC
Hi Kathryn, I believe this bugzilla raises a couple of issues which we may want to track separately based upon the code that is impacted. 1. Performing a manifest refresh takes a long time. 2. When performing a manifest refresh, if the user opens a new tab (or browser), navigates to Content -> Red Hat Subscriptions -> Manage Manifest, the UI will report that the refresh is complete; however, it is still in progress according to Monitor -> Tasks Do you agree? If so, can we track them with separate bugzillas? Also, which is of most concern to users? (In reply to Brad Buckingham from comment #7) > Hi Kathryn, > > I believe this bugzilla raises a couple of issues which we may want to track > separately based upon the code that is impacted. > > 1. Performing a manifest refresh takes a long time. > 2. When performing a manifest refresh, if the user opens a new tab (or > browser), navigates to Content -> Red Hat Subscriptions -> Manage Manifest, > the UI will report that the refresh is complete; however, it is still in > progress according to Monitor -> Tasks > > Do you agree? > If so, can we track them with separate bugzillas? Also, which is of most > concern to users? I agree Brad. Think I forgot to split this into two when I noticed the task issue. Connecting redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/20244 from this bug The current plan from engineering is to address item 2 of comment 7, which stated: 2. When performing a manifest refresh, if the user opens a new tab (or browser), navigates to Content -> Red Hat Subscriptions -> Manage Manifest, the UI will report that the refresh is complete; however, it is still in progress according to Monitor -> Tasks Moving this bug to POST for triage into Satellite 6 since the upstream issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/20244 has been resolved. Moving this bug to POST for triage into Satellite 6 since the upstream issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/20244 has been resolved. Created attachment 1314263 [details]
New tab shows completed before manifest finishes importing
Created attachment 1314264 [details]
Manifest refresh waits until process finishes before updating.
Failed on Satellite-6.3 Snap 11 While the manifest refresh does seem to have been fixed (tested with >2000 subscriptions imported), I hit the issue during initial import (screenshots attached). This is closely related enough to fall under this BZ. (In reply to Christine Fouant from comment #18) > Failed on Satellite-6.3 Snap 11 > > While the manifest refresh does seem to have been fixed (tested with >2000 > subscriptions imported), I hit the issue during initial import (screenshots > attached). This is closely related enough to fall under this BZ. Does it fail against what is said in comment#13? (In reply to Walden Raines from comment #19) > (In reply to Christine Fouant from comment #18) > > Failed on Satellite-6.3 Snap 11 > > > > While the manifest refresh does seem to have been fixed (tested with >2000 > > subscriptions imported), I hit the issue during initial import (screenshots > > attached). This is closely related enough to fall under this BZ. > > Does it fail against what is said in comment#13? No, it didn't fail on refreshing. However, QE told me that initial import behavior should also fall under this BZ. (In reply to Christine Fouant from comment #20) > (In reply to Walden Raines from comment #19) > > (In reply to Christine Fouant from comment #18) > > > Failed on Satellite-6.3 Snap 11 > > > > > > While the manifest refresh does seem to have been fixed (tested with >2000 > > > subscriptions imported), I hit the issue during initial import (screenshots > > > attached). This is closely related enough to fall under this BZ. > > > > Does it fail against what is said in comment#13? > > No, it didn't fail on refreshing. However, QE told me that initial import > behavior should also fall under this BZ. I am going to have to disagree with that given comment#10, comment#11, and comment#13. The time to disapprove of the approach for 6.3 has already passed. I think we should open a new bug for import as they are separate issues anyway. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0336 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0336 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA.
>
> For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below.
>
> If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
>
> https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0336
Has this been fixed in the 6.2.x tree as well? |