| Summary: | [RFE][nova] Support flavor with no local disks | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Charles Crouch <charcrou> | |
| Component: | openstack-nova | Assignee: | nova-maint | |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | nova-maint | |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | low | |||
| Version: | 11.0 (Ocata) | CC: | berrange, charcrou, dasmith, eglynn, kchamart, lyarwood, mbooth, mzheng, racedoro, sbauza, sferdjao, sgordon, srevivo, vromanso | |
| Target Milestone: | Upstream M2 | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Triaged | |
| Target Release: | --- | |||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
| OS: | Unspecified | |||
| URL: | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/flavor-root-disk-none | |||
| Whiteboard: | upstream_milestone_none upstream_definition_pending-approval upstream_status_needs-code-review | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 1384686 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-08-28 15:18:14 UTC | Type: | Feature Request | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1419948, 1433388, 1384686 | |||
|
Description
Charles Crouch
2016-10-13 20:51:18 UTC
(In reply to Charles Crouch from comment #0) > Cisco (Metapod team in particular) would like to see the following blueprint > prioritized in the Ocata cycle: > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/flavor-root-disk-none I'm moving this to Pike planning, the specification was re-approved for Ocata by the original submitter but they did not re-propose the code and we didn't have scope to pick up the development work ourselves. Hi Charles, I assume this is still relevant/important for you folks but can you please confirm? Thanks, Steve Hi Steve Yes it is something we still care about, i.e. to be able to block all local disk creation if needed. Thanks Charles This isn't dead upstream and may yet happen, but it's not something we're planning to actively drive any time soon. |