Bug 1384718

Has there been any update on this?
asterisk-dahdi is looking for dahdi-tools which seem to be now retired.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/dahdi-tools/

will asterisk-dahdi package dependencies be modified or dahdi-tools reinstated?

I am not going to revive the dahdi-tools package. I'm no longer maintaining the Asterisk package so it will be up to the new Asterisk managers to drop dahdi support from the Asterisk package or to take over maintenance of the dahdi-tools package.

I'm (slowly) working on this and trying to get things sorted out.  Unfortunately, I haven't had a lot of time due to my day job.  Hopefully I can finish it up in the next couple of weeks, though.

(In reply to Jared Smith from comment #3)
> I'm (slowly) working on this and trying to get things sorted out. 
> Unfortunately, I haven't had a lot of time due to my day job.  Hopefully I
> can finish it up in the next couple of weeks, though.

I'm not sure if it'll be much help, but I've been building out dahdi-tools and dahdi-linux for quite a while and my specs should be fairly up to date:
https://messinet.com/rpms/browser/dahdi-tools

Hi Jared,

could you please let us know if you had time to look at it yet?

Thanks

(In reply to Jared Smith from comment #3)
> I'm (slowly) working on this and trying to get things sorted out. 
> Unfortunately, I haven't had a lot of time due to my day job.  Hopefully I
> can finish it up in the next couple of weeks, though.

I've repackaged dahdi-tools with the latest version and with systemd support, and have asked for it to be re-reviewed in bz#1422683

Even dahdi rpm installed the asterisk install still failing.


[root@pbx00 ~]# rpm -qa | grep dahdi
kmod-dahdi-linux-4.11.3-200.fc25.x86_64-2.11.1-5.fc25.x86_64
dahdi-tools-2.11.1-3.fc25.x86_64
kmod-dahdi-linux-2.11.1-5.fc25.3.x86_64
akmod-dahdi-linux-2.11.1-5.fc25.x86_64
dahdi-tools-libs-2.11.1-3.fc25.x86_64
dahdi-linux-2.11.1-3.fc25.noarch
kmod-dahdi-linux-4.11.5-200.fc25.x86_64-2.11.1-5.fc25.3.x86_64
asterisk-dahdi-14.5.0-2.git93c10e0.fc25.x86_64
[root@pbx00 ~]# dnf downgrade asterisk\*
Last metadata expiration check: 0:23:10 ago on Wed Jun 21 12:39:01 2017.
Error: nothing provides libtonezone.so.2.0()(64bit) needed by asterisk-dahdi-13.9.1-1.fc25.1.x86_64
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages)

[root@pbx00 ~]# find / -name libtonezone.so.2.0
/usr/lib64/libtonezone.so.2.0

Asterisk spec file missing Require for dahdi package


%package dahdi
Summary: Modules for Asterisk that use DAHDI
Group: Applications/Internet
Requires: asterisk = %{version}-%{release}
Requires: dahdi-tools >= 2.0.0
Requires: dahdi-tools-libs >= 2.0.0
Requires(pre): %{_sbindir}/usermod
Obsoletes: asterisk-zaptel <= 1.6.0-0.22.beta9
Provides: asterisk-zaptel = %{version}-%{release}

This message is a reminder that Fedora 25 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 25. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version'
of '25'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version'
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not
able to fix it before Fedora 25 is end of life. If you would still like
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Fedora 25 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2017-12-12. Fedora 25 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.