Bug 1385681

Summary:	Update to 0.10.x in EPEL7
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Ralph Bean <rbean>
Component:	python-flask-wtf	Assignee:	Praveen Kumar <kumarpraveen.nitdgp>
Status:	NEW ---	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel7	CC:	kumarpraveen.nitdgp, metherid, pj.pandit, tflink
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Ralph Bean 2016-10-17 13:32:39 UTC

It would be great to work with a modern version of this in EPEL7.

Is an update possible?

Comment 1 Praveen Kumar 2017-12-08 12:09:24 UTC

Hi @marcindulak,

I am not much now involved with this piece of module now and happy to add you as co-maintainer if you want.

Comment 2 marcindulak 2017-12-08 12:26:41 UTC

Thanks for the quick answer. I see the package is maintained using separate spec files for each Fedora/EPEL branch, the most common maintenance way, therefore I won't have time to help - too much branching and duplicate work for me :(

I see however that the last activity was by @tflink
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/python-flask-wtf.git/commit/python-flask-wtf.spec?id=a5715c90c6956bb37001df16038c5692e870e6e6

Maybe @tflink is willing to continue to maintain the package in EPEL?

Comment 3 Tim Flink 2023-06-02 21:50:15 UTC

Apologies for the delayed response, I managed to lose the request in my email.

I don't really use EPEL7 and don't have an interest in maintaining this package there. I suspect that there is no longer interest in seeing it updated in that branch, though.