Bug 1385682

Summary: [ceph-iscsi-ansible]: "ceph-iscsi-gw.yml" installs upstream ceph-common if no ceph repo present
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Tejas <tchandra>
Component: DocumentationAssignee: Aron Gunn <agunn>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: ceph-qe-bugs <ceph-qe-bugs>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 2.1CC: adeza, aschoen, asriram, ceph-eng-bugs, gmeno, hnallurv, kdreyer, nthomas, sankarshan, tchandra
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: 2.2   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-06 15:41:33 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Comment 4 Paul Cuzner 2016-10-18 23:07:30 UTC 
If I understand correctly, this is basically due to the gateway node not having the rhcs channel assigned to it. When you deployed the osd's the channels were there because of ceph-ansible - but for a dedicated gateway you didn't use downstream ceph ansible with a client role, or set up the channels manually on the gateway...is this right?
Comment 5 Tejas 2016-10-19 04:29:11 UTC 
yes, on the gateway node the downstream ceph repos are not present. This is not applicable to upstream ceph.

Thanks,
Tejas
Comment 6 Paul Cuzner 2016-10-19 05:55:36 UTC 
OK - so is this a documentation BZ? ie we need to ensure that the gateways are subscribed to the correct channels
Comment 7 Tejas 2016-10-19 07:31:14 UTC 
I understand that there are no separate checks for downstream packages. So yes we need to ensure customers have the downstream repos enabled.
Comment 10 Tejas 2016-11-09 06:37:06 UTC 
The warning looks good to me.

Moving to Verified