Bug 1386471

Summary: "Warning: more packages were installed by yum than expected:" and "Warning: yum did not install the following packages:"
Product: Red Hat Satellite 5 Reporter: Jan Hutař <jhutar>
Component: InstallerAssignee: Tomáš Kašpárek <tkasparek>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Red Hat Satellite QA List <satqe-list>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 580CC: jhutar, tlestach
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-03 21:24:16 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1291203    

Description Jan Hutař 2016-10-19 04:53:06 UTC 
Description of problem:
There is unexpected installer output: "Warning: more packages were installed by yum than expected:" and "Warning: yum did not install the following packages:"


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Satellite-5.8-RHEL-6-20161018.n.0


How reproducible:
always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install


Actual results:
Warning: more packages were installed by yum than expected:
	crypto-utils
	mod_perl
	perl-BSD-Resource
	perl-Frontier-RPC
	perl-Frontier-RPC-doc
	perl-Newt
	python-psycopg2
Warning: yum did not install the following packages:
	antlr
	compat-libstdc++-33
	jakarta-commons-codec
	jakarta-commons-lang
	jakarta-oro
	jdom
	libXp
	objectweb-asm
	perl-Class-Singleton
	perl-DateTime
	perl-Error
	perl-List-MoreUtils
	perl-Net-LibIDN
	perl-Params-Validate
	xalan-j2


Expected results:
No warnings in the installer output
Comment 1 Tomas Lestach 2016-12-02 12:47:33 UTC 
Isn't this a dupe of Bug 1281691?
Comment 2 Jan Hutař 2016-12-03 21:24:16 UTC 
Yep, looks like we are going to solve every package like ^^^ in bug 1281691 even although this is against 5.7.0 - no need to keep this open here as we are not going to fix this in 5.7.0. Thank you.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1281691 ***
Comment 3 Jan Hutař 2016-12-03 21:25:19 UTC 
Err, this one is for 5.8.0, that one is for 5.7.0, but I hope we all got the point.