Bug 1387004
| Summary: | rebase libgexiv2 to 0.10.4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Matthias Clasen <mclasen> |
| Component: | libgexiv2 | Assignee: | Richard Hughes <rhughes> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 7.4 | CC: | debarshir, mcepl, mclasen, tpelka |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Rebase |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | libgexiv2-0.10.4-2.el7 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-08-01 09:58:23 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1383353 | ||
|
Description
Matthias Clasen
2016-10-20 00:37:22 UTC
Trying to develop an implementation of make check in https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723790 Would it be possible to add (when finished) to the package? When looking at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723790 I found that we don't have in our package fix for https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775249 (which was not included in the upstream tarball for 0.10.4). Could/should we include it as a distribution patch? It would make the test suite to have at least two tests ;) (In reply to Matěj Cepl from comment #4) > When looking at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723790 I found > that we don't have in our package fix for > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775249 (which was not included in > the upstream tarball for 0.10.4). Could/should we include it as a > distribution patch? It would make the test suite to have at least two tests > ;) Matthias what do you think? Thanks -Tom I think we agreed that we should add the tests upstream and then pick them up next time we rebased. I don't think the simple tests as is actually test very much and are not IMHO a reason to fail QA. The names of the Python subpackages were changed to better comply with the packaging guidelines. However that had some fallout in Fedora: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QKXEMPU64RKMQY3AGIOG6GM7EVU4HQX2/ I have added the necessary Provides to retain compatibility in libgexiv2-0.10.4-2.el7: https://brewweb.engineering.redhat.com/brew/taskinfo?taskID=13241347 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:2307 |