| Summary: | ACl DNS host filter in Console accept IPv4 and IPv6 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Directory Server | Reporter: | Kamlesh <kchaudha> |
| Component: | Directory Console | Assignee: | mreynolds |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Viktor Ashirov <vashirov> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 10.0 | CC: | kbanerje, mreynolds, nhosoi, nkinder |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2019-08-26 08:28:03 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Kamlesh
2016-10-21 07:34:16 UTC
Reading the source code, only FQDN is supported for DNS. /* LASDnsMatch * Given an array of fully-qualified dns names, tries to match them * against a given hash table. Unfortunately, the doc does not mention it clearly, but it says "name" not "address". 13.1. Access Control Principles For a specific location such as an IP address or a DNS name. I'd think this is an RFE not a defect. And the product/component is RHEL/389-ds-base. The priority is low. Ah, sorry, Kamlesh. You meant the other way? Since the server ACL does not support IPv6 addr, Console should reject it? If so, I agree it should. But again it's not a regression and not urgent... Set it to RHDS 10.2. |