Bug 1389125

Summary:	viostor extend viostor driver with STORAGE_REQUEST_BLOCK support
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7	Reporter:	Vadim Rozenfeld <vrozenfe>
Component:	virtio-win	Assignee:	Vadim Rozenfeld <vrozenfe>
virtio-win sub component:	others	QA Contact:	Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	Docs Contact:
Severity:	unspecified
Priority:	unspecified	CC:	ailan, juzhang, lijin, lmiksik, michen, wyu
Version:	7.4
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:	Feature: STORAGE_REQUEST_BLOCK support Reason: The STORAGE_REQUEST_BLOCK is the extended format SCSI Request Block (SRB) structure. Starting in Windows 8, an extended SRB type is supported with the use of the STORAGE_REQUEST_BLOCK structure. Result: STORAGE_REQUEST_BLOCK extends SRB functions, allowing extended data blocks for the SRB function to be added to the request.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-08-01 12:53:08 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Vadim Rozenfeld 2016-10-26 23:11:00 UTC

Description of problem:

The STORAGE_REQUEST_BLOCK is the extended format SCSI Request Block (SRB) structure. Starting in Windows 8, an extended SRB type is supported with the use of the STORAGE_REQUEST_BLOCK structure. STORAGE_REQUEST_BLOCK extends SRB functions, allowing extended data blocks for the SRB function to be added to the request.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Vadim Rozenfeld 2016-10-31 06:21:44 UTC

At this stage we just need to check that the  
driver, compiled for Win8/Win10 platforms 
continues  operate properly.

Comment 2 Vadim Rozenfeld 2017-05-25 00:08:37 UTC

Changes for this case were introduces in build 128. As long as we have no regressions in WHQL and functional tests, I would count it as verified.

Thanks,
Vadim.

Comment 3 lijin 2017-05-25 01:51:22 UTC

Change status to verified as whql and function test passed.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2017-08-01 12:53:08 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:2341