| Summary: | [TPS]: Package verification is failing for the package redhat-release-server-7.3-8.el7rhgs | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Byreddy <bsrirama> |
| Component: | build | Assignee: | Sreenath G <sgirijan> |
| Status: | CLOSED CANTFIX | QA Contact: | Rahul Hinduja <rhinduja> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rhgs-3.1 | CC: | amukherj, asrivast, bsrirama, rcyriac, rhinduja, rhs-bugs, sgirijan, storage-qa-internal |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-02-06 14:25:58 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Byreddy
2016-10-27 15:47:51 UTC
Sreenath, Please address redhat-release-server package verification issues. Isn't TPS installing redhat-release-server from Gluster over redhat-release-server from RHEL? I suppose that the supported use case is fresh installation from Gluster media and not installing the package on top of RHEL. The behavior might be expected due to following lines in spec file: %config /etc/os-release %config /etc/system-release-cpe %config(noreplace) /etc/issue %config(noreplace) /etc/issue.net (In reply to Daniel Mach from comment #13) > Isn't TPS installing redhat-release-server from Gluster over > redhat-release-server from RHEL? Version of rhgs redhat-release-server is higher than the package present in the RHEL so during update/install of gluster we get the rhgs version of redhat-release-server, this is not a problem now. > I suppose that the supported use case is fresh installation from Gluster > media and not installing the package on top of RHEL. > > > The behavior might be expected due to following lines in spec file: > %config /etc/os-release > %config /etc/system-release-cpe > %config(noreplace) /etc/issue > %config(noreplace) /etc/issue.net If this behavior is expected then we can waive this in TPS as "EXPECTED" Ok, closing as CANTFIX |