Bug 138949

Summary:	SELinux policy packages should be upgraded before udev?
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Aleksey Nogin <aleksey>
Component:	selinux-policy-strict	Assignee:	Daniel Walsh <dwalsh>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Mike McLean <mikem>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	3	CC:	harald, katzj, nobody+pnasrat, rcoker
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	SELinux
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2004-11-17 20:24:18 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Aleksey Nogin 2004-11-12 01:50:13 UTC

I am upgrading SELinux-enables FC2 to FC3. When anaconda was upgrading
the udev package, it complained (a lot) about invalid contexts in
/etc/security/selinux/file_contexts. Would it be a good idea to try to
avoid these warning messages by upgrading the SELinux policy packages
before udev?

Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2004-11-12 15:58:38 UTC

anaconda orders things entirely based on what the RPM package ordering
is (which is based on dependencies).  Assigning to selinux-policy as
it's a transition issue from the FC2 -> FC3 SELinux.

Comment 2 Daniel Walsh 2004-11-17 20:24:18 UTC

This is a difficult problem since we do not want to put a dependancy
in udev on a particular SELinux policy.  So I guess the only thing I
can say is that I hope policy will not change as radically as it did
between FC2 and FC3 again.

Comment 3 Harald Hoyer 2004-11-18 10:42:01 UTC

well, I could put a "conflicts" in udev

Comment 4 Daniel Walsh 2004-11-18 15:05:05 UTC

What would that do?  I though conflicts would prevent udev from being
installed?

Dan