Bug 1390145

Summary: UI: Openshift provider doesn't refresh automatically when added, incorrect info for hawkular creds
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine Reporter: Jan Krocil <jkrocil>
Component: UI - OPSAssignee: Yaacov Zamir <yzamir>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Dafna Ron <dron>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 5.7.0CC: bazulay, dajohnso, hkataria, jhardy, jkrocil, mpovolny, obarenbo
Target Milestone: GA   
Target Release: cfme-future   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: container
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-09 15:13:31 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: Container Management Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jan Krocil 2016-10-31 10:04:40 UTC 
Description of problem:
SSIA

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
5.7.0.7

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Add an openshift provider with  default creds (no hawkular hostname)

Actual results:
Provider just lingers in the UI with no data loaded.
In addition, it says on the summary page that "Hawkular Authentication	Valid - 3 Minutes Ago" which is doubtful because I didn't input any hostname in the hawkular tab when adding the provider

Expected results:
Automatic refresh, no hawkular authentication.

Workaround:
Things begin to work once you manually refresh the provider.
Comment 2 Yaacov Zamir 2016-11-09 15:06:40 UTC 
> Expected results:
> Automatic refresh, no hawkular authentication.

If no hawkular credentials are explicitly given they are taken from the openshift tab (hostname and token)
So hawkular should be authenticated, if you have hawkular running and the hostname and token are correct ...

> Expected results:
> Automatic refresh

This bug is very similar to:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389278

Is it a copy of 1389278 ?
Comment 3 Yaacov Zamir 2016-11-09 15:13:31 UTC 
Closing as Duplicate

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1389278 ***