Bug 139086
Summary: | System hangs on logout | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Bob Kline <bkline+keyword+fedora.28d45b> | ||||
Component: | xorg-x11 | Assignee: | X/OpenGL Maintenance List <xgl-maint> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> | ||||
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 3 | CC: | davej | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | i686 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2005-04-11 19:14:57 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Bob Kline
2004-11-12 20:52:15 UTC
same thing happens for me. kossler.edu I hate it, if people blame udev per random!! Created attachment 107256 [details]
Log found after a crash
> I hate it, if people blame udev per random!!
I didn't say I was blaming udev. What I actually wrote was "I really
have no idea what component to select for this report." If there's a
way to file a bug report without selecting a component, I'd be glad to
have you point it out to me. If there's a component that means "I
don't know which component is causing the failure" buried in the 432KB
page that comes up when you click on the help for component assignment
I'm afraid I missed it. If you prefer that users not report problems
if they don't know which component is responsible for those problems,
then perhaps you need a vacation. :->}
For the future, just so you know (although I admit completely that it is non-obvious to anyone who hasn't been directly informed), is to choose the "distribution" component when unsure what component is at fault. This goes to our technical lead, who is rather good at determining the most likely faulty component and reassigning it to that component for investigation. Another benefit of doing this is to ensure one's bug actually gets looked at, because due to bug volume, sometimes misfiled bugs fall between the cracks. Also the developer who ends up getting a misfiled bug report may themselves not know what the right component is, resulting sometimes in a bit of a game of "pass the hot potato", which isn't helpful to the original reporter. ;o) Looking at your attached info, I only see one thing that jumps out at me: drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (Unknown error 999) drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (Unknown error 999) drmOpenDevice: Open failed drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (Unknown error 999) drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (Unknown error 999) drmOpenDevice: Open failed While drmOpenDevice later does succeed, it seems perhaps there is a bug in the kernel mga DRM code there, which eventually goes away. I've carbon copied our kernel maintainer for comment about that as he's more likely to know about the kernel side of DRM than I. Is this log file /var/log/Xorg.0.log from while the X server is running, or was it backed up after the problem, and before you started the X server up again? I ask, because often people have a crash, then reboot or restart X, which wipes out /var/log/Xorg.0.log with the new server's log, so it never shows any errors that may have caused the problem. If this is the case, the old log file, the real one from the crash, is renamed to .log.old, and should be attached. Also, please attach the /var/log/messages file including all text from initial boot onward until the crash occurs, as that often yields many clues useful for debugging, which may be non-obvious. Please try disabling DRI by commenting out the 'Load "dri"' option from the xorg.conf config file. If this resolves the problem, please update the report ot indicate that too. I notice your system is SMP also. Another test that would be useful is to boot into the uniprocessor (UP) kernel so it's only using a single processor, but keeping DRI enabled. If this makes the problem go away, this could be an DRI+SMP problem that seems to be happening for a lot of people using multiprocessor on different hardware, and seems to point to a generic DRI locking issue of some sort that hasn't yet been determined. Knowing if DRI works on this card on this system with one CPU would be greatly useful. Thanks in advance. Since this bugzilla report was filed, there have been several major updates to the X Window System, which may resolve this issue. Users who have experienced this problem are encouraged to upgrade to the latest version of Fedora Core, which can be obtained from: http://fedora.redhat.com/download If this issue turns out to still be reproduceable in the latest version of Fedora Core, please file a bug report in the X.Org bugzilla located at http://bugs.freedesktop.org in the "xorg" component. Once you've filed your bug report to X.Org, if you paste the new bug URL here, Red Hat will continue to track the issue in the centralized X.Org bug tracker, and will review any bug fixes that become available for consideration in future updates. Setting status to "CURRENTRELEASE". |