Bug 1391741

Summary: RHV-H OS version information in the RHV-M GUI doesn't appear to be complete.
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Reporter: Bimal Chollera <bcholler>
Component: rhev-hypervisor-ngAssignee: Yuval Turgeman <yturgema>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: dguo
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.0.3CC: bazulay, bugs, cshao, dfediuck, dguo, dougsland, gklein, huzhao, jiawu, lsurette, michal.skrivanek, mkalinin, qiyuan, rbarry, sbonazzo, srevivo, weiwang, yaniwang, ycui, ykaul, yzhao
Target Milestone: ovirt-4.2.0   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-02-28 16:11:34 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: Node RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Bimal Chollera 2016-11-03 22:12:44 UTC 
Description of problem:

In the RHV-M GUI, the RHV-H OS Version information doesn't appear to report the correct version.

RHV-M GUI (Hosts -> Software) shows:

~~~
OS Version:  RHEL - 4.0 - 0.20.el7
OS Description:  Red Hat Virtualization Host 4.0
~~~

Checking on the host, shows rhvh-4.0-0.20160714.3+1

~~~
# imgbase w
[INFO] You are on rhvh-4.0-0.20160714.3+1
~~~


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

RHV-M 4.0.3-0.1.el7ev
vdsm-4.18.6-1.el7ev

How reproducible:
100% 

Steps to Reproduce:
1.  Add a RHV-H host to RHV-M
2.  Check the OS version in RHV-M GUI (Hosts -> Software)
3.

Actual results:

RHV-M doesn't report the complete rhv-h version.

Expected results:

RHV-M should report the complete rhv-h version.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Fabian Deutsch 2016-11-22 10:18:25 UTC 
We can include the image NVR in the os-release PRETTY_NAME.
These informations should be available once we post-process the image.

The only drawback is a longer PRETTY_NAME string.
Comment 2 Ryan Barry 2017-02-03 15:30:57 UTC 
Adding a longer PRETTY_NAME will tie into plymouth as well, potentially leaving a very long string.

Let's tie this into https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368364
Comment 3 Douglas Schilling Landgraf 2017-02-28 16:11:34 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1368364 ***